To make you happy: the wallpaper Carla Bru ... Sarkozy, young!
Carla Bruni naturalized in 5 sec
Go, a few people for a change! Although the policy is not far.
I just heard on a blog, have announced that Claude Gueant naturalization Express Carla Bruni, against all rules and laws of the Republic.
Our elected monarch gave us a beautiful demonstration of the fact of the prince.
In principle, a Franco-foreigner must prove several years (4-5) of common life and residence in the country for abroad (e) could be grant French nationality, whose allocation is also not automatic.
Before the law does not harden, the duration of cohabitation was 2 years, but the fight against bogus marriages.
This law clearly aimed blacks, because every black (e) who marries a (e) French (e) is necessarily suspected of contracting a marriage ... When I say black is at large, I mean the poor third world in general.
It goes without saying that a black African son of minister or good family FranCafrican have no desire to see grant French nationality (again it should be understood broadly and black Françafrique broad sense: all neo-colonial countries, ie almost all former colonies).
Well, once again, we demonstrate that the discourse on the birthright, the right soil, the France you love it or leave it, the fight against immigration and so on. is a vast hypocrisy.
votes are gained on average franchouillard and reactionary ...
makes me more than anything else the trouble: if the medium is so reactionary franchouillard also means that its average life is shit and it alleviates the yelling is more miserable than cons.
hypocrisy of political rhetoric, including reactionary ...
Basically, this is doubly poor franchouillard screwed by the elites: in swallowing and speech reactionary facade politicians (whether left or right, given that today racism is more uninhibited because of the extreme right, which also means little or not, while yet the media climate has never been racist in France I know), he turned against the poor buggers with whom he has more in common than anything else (the contempt of the elites, the life of poverty, social insecurity ...) and he loses sight of the real culprits. .. Those who puff ortolans tringlent and top models in showing off on the yacht and luxury hotels.
Instead of despising the poor cloistered in the cities, the basic franchouillard should realize that the conditions living in cities is what awaits him as he continues to be led by the nose by corrupt elites.
The situation in France could take as long as there was a real middle class, but it is increasingly precarious, more and more suburban: I see among my colleagues, with the increasing massive fortune real estate, even the executives have fled the central cities to settle in the suburbs more and more distant ... A good crash should also not delay for any damn flat and put homeowners in trouble ... New avalanche of bullshit ahead for the coast ... Sarkozy's popularity
Asked Sarkozy is racist? What can we respond?
Sarkozy is not racist ... Or if not as one might think ...
Sarkozy is not racist, or he is racist as are the aristocrats and the bourgeois class is racist. Do not forget he has his father's aristocratic origins and bourgeois by his mother ... Bourgeois and aristocrats from all countries are not racist among them: a son of French billionaire marry a girl easier Muslim billionaire, a poor French shepherdess. Origin and religion are secondary in these cases.
Basically if Sarkozy is a racist, his racism certainly extends to the big red-faced redneck who voted for him ... But stops when the bank account allows you to escape the blackness or bougnoulitude ...
Racism is a bullshit invented to divide the poor slobs them, make them fight, hate, fight against each other, in short to waste time and energy and leave the field open to those who decide.
I did not vote in 2007, the scam was too big ... The campaign had focused on anything but Sarkozy, Sego to win by reaction ...
When we see that the government took over the Sarko PS ministers would have probably named Sego, we think we lost anything.
Instead, I prefer a cash Sarko, who is there and that clearly shows the contempt he has for the common people, that people realize that a good shot.
Sego Sarko same Emptiness ... Uselessness and lure of democracy ...
With Sego we would have had a more soft than Sarko, but also more insidious. At least he shows off ... If it can help open your eyes ...
Anyway policy is decided behind our backs, and policies are only belts. Business lobbies run all the evidence, the democratic voice of the NO in the referendum on the EU constitution is violated with the complicity of the right and the left (which has not voted against the adoption of the parliamentary treaty).
So what the policy is a decoy? Marketing? Yes ...
democracy, a scam? Yes ... You feel you count in the decisions that are taken you?
uselessness of political commitment
"But nothing prevents you to get involved in politics blah blah "... Asshole goes, You can certainly try to get involved in a partner or a party, we'll send you paste posters and meetings that are useless if it is the illusion that you participate in local politics for most rabid ... we will send throwing stones, just to play in the revolution and that you can unwind yourself ... Once
you want to get involved seriously in politics that is trying to influence the debate, see accapparer post-decision, if you do not sleep to our market you are gun ... we Dieudonné has proved that a black said what he thought (and think what a lot of blacks, that the memory of suffering Afro is violated, and that the competition of victimhood that those who complain that the substance, although competition is a big word, we should talk about monopoly) was good for the stake ...
It would be 200 years ago, Dieudonné had been captured, he would have stuffed his ass with gunpowder, and it would have exploded in the public square in front of other slaves to teach them to rebel .. . Yes, it seems that such punishment was practiced ...
Today gunpowder was replaced by media defamation and professional ruin, but in principle it changes nothing, a black freedom zouquer, but should not he dares to open his mouth ...
So all genuine political commitment is impossible: either you're completely taken over and neutralized completely in vain actions, or if you are spotted as intransigent you are pushed to the margin, and if you are considered as potential leader, so beware you!
The only way: to understand what is expected of the negro or nigger today and play the game
Must hurry, with competition on the visibility of blacks and Arabs in the media, there are places to take. Apparently there is also a lot of guys ready to fight and sell fathers and mothers to get there, having their mouths on TV or on a list, and wages that are consistent with ...
And the worst is that I imagine you know: the types who started from scratch after several years of policy can make their careers in brackets to sell, or rather sell their address book, as a consultant in private lobbyist understand, with wages as a Minister in the 12 000 euros per month.
Anyway, I am totally disgusted with politics and I am convinced that all political speeches are playing on the flank the mood of the moment, mood spread on the media ...
10 years ago when winning the World Cup, we were all Black Blanc Beur ...
Today blacks and Beurs are all anti-Semitic ...
In 2 cases is that the press gives the ...
Uselessness humanitarian engagement
"Yeah, but poor apple, you have to be active in humanitarian associations so if you want to be helpful and change things." Bis asshole!
First, humanitarian organizations will not change the system of injustice and oppression who fucks the shit not only here but also in Africa and the Third World in general.
This system supports the injustices ... Let me explain by giving a clear conscience in this country neo-colonization, he keeps his eyes closed on the real issues.
occuppe Furthermore it advocates the more ready to engage, detracting from the real fight needs to happen here in the rich countries, not in Africa.
Just look at that third world countries that are doing best, like China and India are also those who refused external interference, including that of humanitarian. Then
often behind the better-known, hide barbouzards that make the interference under the guise of humanitarian espionage, weapons delivery, support for armed factions and militias ... All assos are not like that, but unfortunately we can not say it's wrong, when Kouchner himself has recognized.
And finally, imagine that I know something about the middle of the humanitarian need to say what is, I know lots of people who do that as we take a safari in Africa ...
They start delivering water pumps, or give French lessons, and already have big pictures in their heads ... They believe their work is useless, parcequ'avec corruption and tribalism that exists in Africa, the pump will be in the chief's hut as a trophy, and eventually rusted and useless ...
For the most honest of these motivations were clear: there are plenty of pretty nice and cool chicks who go do humanitarian work, is the opportunity to make friends with a nurse or language teacher ...
And I'm not talking about pedophilia cases that have involved humanitarian of the entourage of the innénarrable Bernard Kouchner ...
Anyway, ultimately, the final word on all this: the vanity ... All this is useless!
Respect to the doctor and the nurse who saves the life of a small child who is likely anyway to get sniper or crushed by a tank after a few years ...
But rather than treat symptoms, it is the cause of the disease must be tackled ...
And that's the whole system of international relations need to rethink and flat, identifying why the system generates so many horrors and injustices, and how to avoid ...
The problem is the system, political activist for the humane and engaging part of the system ... If we want things to change, we must go to war against the system!
Haaa I dream almost the day we will be ruled by machines, without emotion, without passion, without desire for power and domination, not knowing the love of money and all that follows. ..
Until our political systems are based on it is what will prevail ...
I do not believe in representative democracy, as giving a power an elected representative is to allow it to be corruptible.
Politicians come and go, the lobbies remain.
worse, today they are the lobbies that nominate candidates, so the elected ...
The basis of all this shit: the power of money.
Imagine that Dieudonné is rich as Croesus overnight: it buys TF1, finances films on slavery, finance the next presidential candidate, and of course in return gets a new deal in relations FranCafrican, obtains days of commemorations etc..
Problem: wealth fall from the sky. To become rich, become part of the club, he must necessarily pass through phases of capital accumulation that take generations and over time you change ... The great grand son of Dieudonne is a billionaire if he is a good chance it has nothing to fuck in Africa and that he be put entirely complicit with the powers of mafia money. Moreover
want proof: Just look at the Muslim billionaires? What are they doing to the Muslims who call for help? Bugger all: they are studying at Harvard, and spend their money in casinos luxury to spend their Holiday Packages Saint Tropez, and frequent whores who pass earn the same as the average salary of French ... They are fully recovered by the system ... And it will hardly took 2 generations to rot as they leave ...
Those who do not work in these schemes are either killed or are accused of terrorism and is seen stuck on the bottom of the attacks without any evidence (so far nothing serious has to prove that bin Laden is guilty 911, besides, it is likely there to defend himself).
So the problem is actually much money that corrupts all ...
Who controls the money? Which the product? The prints? Puts it in circulation?
In a democracy it is expected that the main power is in the hands of popular representation: it is false, ECB in Europe and America EDF are private banks that are accountable to no state .
other words, they are private bankers, not politicians, who s'occuppent of money ...
So first thing we need to reclaim the money.
Then, we must study all the mechanisms by which the money can ... All religions forbid lending at interest ... Why?
Large old they had smelt the scrambles?
The money goes to live, but from a critical mass it becomes a weapon! Individual wealth, capital accumulation beyond certain limits, rules of inheritance should be redesigned ....
Money in public life and democratic should also be considered ...
The right to information should be free and fair part of human rights, and for that we must establish a set of rules to prevent the media from being accapparrés by money ...
We fought for centuries to free itself of state censorship, censorship to get back on the money!
the same way that merely increasing the possession of money, you should also limit down, and establish a minimum income of humanity ...
Every human being should be able to have the minimum for living, eating, dressing, hot, heal, learn (schools, media).
How many geniuses die every day before reaching the age of 5?
To prevent abuses around money, we should make all accounts public, more secrets ...
Everyone can tell at a click of the mouse that everyone has, money and valuable goods (cars, houses, yachts ...).
could lengthen the list of proposed studies for a while like that ...
Besides, we should first clear all the debts, and rethink the way we live, so that everyone can live with dignity.
It is obvious that if we want that everyone can live decently, we can not continue to pollute like that in Europe, and we can not accept that other countries will follow suit.
Only it is hypocritical to ban China and India to drive a jalopy if we do not change too.
must leave everything flat and redefine all ...
Reorient agriculture for subsistence and for profit or speculation ...
short, is a global new deal is needed by identifying all the power centers, starting with the one and only real center of power, that of money.
This may seem a little naive, I have no solutions, I just found problems ...
If some want to contribute positively, we can start think together ...
Cismigiu disgusted?
Not realistic ... I just need to take to demonstrate that the old schemes of my family went through in Romania: royalist, communist, free market democracy ...
The difference between these 3 systems?
Slim ... Very thin ...
At the time of King, you shut your mouth and you not criticizing the king or you will land in jail. For the rest, public affairs, the economy was the case of the affluent.
Basically, if the types of messing up too much, the economy was relatively well and you lived not too bad ... In a crisis it is you who clutched the belt until it passes ...
To spend royalism to communism was not asked his opinion to the people, simple coup.
course, immediately after the Communist coup, was not talk of a coup, but democratic and popular revolution against the tyrannical regime of before ...
During communism ditto: if you opened your mouth against the party, you were sent to jail and you will be stuck in political trials in the ass. The ruling classes if they managed not too bad economy, people had nothing to say they had to eat on the table, could go on holiday to the sea, watching TV ... When the crisis set in and he had to tighten their belts, it's still the people who morflé ...
To transition from communism to market democracy, there was not yet sought the views of people: the coup.
Well, we still live in this new system there, so it is no exaggeration to say that it is a coup. It is a popular and democratic revolution against the tyrannical regime before.
Again, what really matters to people is the alternation of periods of economic crises and relative calm ...
But in life every day nothing has changed ...
Prisons are the same since the days of King under the communists and today. You do not change a prison system that wins ... The inner secret police, which existed in the time of the king, has continued to improve. Today it is more discreet than in the days of communism when the goal was to scare people to force them to censor themselves and go straight. She returned to its original objectives, spy, and has adopted modern means.
For self-censorship, no need to allow the threat of the secret police: just to let the associations to paste trial ass citizens who back too, and let the power of money do the rest.
Anyway, everyone was converted successively royalism to communism to democracy and market ...
Why I take this example? Because this is more or less all countries experienced as political developments ... Plans call as you like, royalty, empire, the first republic, third republic, second empire, the mullahs' regime, the Shah regime, tsarist, Soviet, Caliphate, People's Republic ...
Diets pass, but people's lives do not change. They do not make decisions for their lives. Everything is packaged outside their reach.
They undergo ... If there is Thune then fine, if the crisis when you suffered, if it's war you are trying to survive ...
It feels may not be relevant in France Because it makes a bunch of years that there was no real crisis, and even real wars (you can not compare the Russian front and the occupation of France virtually without a fight), but in lots of countries around the world, people morflent morflait worse than at the time of the Great Depression ...
Basically all that to say that basically, all plans are alike: it's autocracy that prevails, whether aristocratic, bourgeois, religious or political.
Show me a true democracy?
And do not tell me "at least you vote here." Primo in dictatorships as they vote, then I can vote more finito!
The big difference between here and dictatorships is that at least here we are smarter and are made more credible genre scores of 50/50 to close pouillièmes that make the difference ... Instead of 99.97% (note the 0.3% granted) banana republic ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment