Africa, Caribbean, Dieudonné: development of Claude Ribbe
I do not know if speaking of "agitated" it includes my blog since a few days ago I expressed my regret over the fact that a guy I found was not smart like Ribbe This was quite beside Dieudonné. I also made him the reproach of its ambiguous position on the Africans. In an editorial
he explained clearly and concisely: it uses the word, finally, to "campaign against Dieudonné. Bravo for having used the word!
It explains its position vis-à-vis Africa: what are the rejects of the genus Pap N'dyaye collaborators, as well as barbouzards françafricain. We also reject!
also expresses its sincere relationship with the real African leaders, foremost among them Thabo Mbecke! it's good, I think Thabo Mbecke, Desmond Tutu or Mandela as the honor of Africa and the Third World in general, the few politicians who dared denounce global clear state racism in some countries ( is it a surprise if they are banned from some countries due to antisémitisation?).
Bravo Mr. Ribbe, and also congratulations for your recent editorial, strong pugnacious, which breaks the usual political jargon!
I think that's what voters expect your potential, and is brave, especially if you come without a label, so without the protection of a party and his network.
assured that as you continue to tell the truth forcefully, many of us among the base and anonymous support you, and relay calls. We may not be available interpersonal politicians, but at a time when the base is increasingly wary of its political representatives is disants (this appears clearly in the internal conflict between unionists and strikers both among students and staff) I think it's time for a generation of brave men, to break the stranglehold of political parties on public speaking, and speak directly to voters that you do on your blog, what we do on ours.
Call for formation of a representative council of West Indians and Africans in France People often ask me why I denounce the Cran. It's very simple: the skull was trained in emergency and in secret by a small handful of African upstarts who believe fill handle in the wake of the crisis in the suburbs and countryside Anti-Dieudonne, West Indians and Africans in France. With incredible naivete, they thought to pose as sole interlocutors with a government disoriented by the crisis, mired in racist and incapable of managing the law Taubira. With the support of some ignorant journalists and communications firm well known on the Paris, the case worked for a while. But the government soon realized he was shooting itself in the foot by playing into the hands of the extreme right. Indeed, using the racial prejudice and communitarianism as a slogan, the propaganda around the Cran advances Jean-Marie Le Pen several points. CRAN has finally exploded when the shameful exploitation and rewarding to hear that Patrick Lozes memory of slavery has been revealed. How do we imagine that the Cran can prosper while it was imagined by a Pap Ndiaye, stooge Pétré-Grenouilleau, historian and ignorant liar who accuses the Africans to be responsible for slavery, so that was taken to the baptismal font by Pocrain which paved with illuminated racist Tribe Ka, a son of Minister Lozes Benin prostrate before the power? Some
agitated accuse me of picking on Africans. I do have never been racist as Africans and communitarians, for half-pay of French Africa, the toadies, the yes-man, the defenders of Napoleon and revisionist ideology.
True Africans - and there were not many - were at my side in Port-au-Prince on January 1, 2004 to celebrate the bicentennial of Haiti. No, we were not numerous, but among us there was Thabo Mbeki, the man who protects my friend Jean-Bertrand Aristide on behalf of the 53 countries of the African Union. So I did no lessons to receive small colonial auxiliaries in the pay of énarchie franchouillard Beke-Banania.
Since Cran is dead, so I propose today to all the French anti-racism from the Caribbean or Africa to come together not by the criterion of the absurd and segregationist skin color but based on their origins and their specific problems in forming, in a spirit of transparency and respect for others, a representative council of West Indians and Africans in France.
media manipulation, exploitation of racism and antiracism. Jews, whites, blacks, Arab handled all! Interview
negrophobia Manipulation of France 2 and Supplemental Survey: Dusquesne accomplice.
By reading this article A2N , I learn that France2 announced a subject on black community factions "antisemitic" ...
This confirms what I suspected in my previous article on the subject KS was actually a trap to derail and mount a show of sending the black community thesis dangerous to the republic, anti-Semitic, anti-white etc.. ..
I suspected for several reasons: I know by heart what kind of journalists, who had to deal with them in my youth. And I've seen too many stories absolutely not credible on so called "bullies" of the city, which made false show of violence. The stories are legion cans, but bigger is more things going on ...
The objectivity of the employees of "journalism"
I remember being younger, when there was unrest in the neighborhoods, we saw land this kind of "journalists", generally working for programs such as "Special Envoy" ("Zionist envoy" would be more accurate), or "Forbidden Zone" ("Zone NonSionistes prohibited "would be more accurate).
Such journalists were first to take the temperature by" disguising "sometimes sir-all-the-world, so as not to attract attention: they parked their van a little apart, came the ATV Safety, fucked a tracksuit top and came to the cities as they passed by there by chance ... In other words, they deceived no one and were easily detected, but it did not stop them ... They had to continue a subject to do!
Once the temperature taken, and when they had pictures, they came with their equipment, handheld camera and everything.
They then began a tour of the city to discuss with the "natives".
initially not aware of the perfidy of these characters, there were still "big brothers", or "big sisters" (as the jargon of journalists, anyone who looks smarter and more mature than the average is necessarily a big brother, even if only son) who would speak clearly and fantasies of real concerns and problems of cities adopting an intelligent discourse, courteous, well-argued, clear and French-language chat ...
other words, nothing that corresponds to the cliches that journalists were picking up!
Because yes, the fundamental misunderstanding was:
big brothers or big sisters who would speak dispassionately and intelligently before the cameras, imagined that the journalists had come to do a real investigative work .
A real investigative work requires them to come to work without a-priori, seeking to understand the situation, and making a report balanced and objective based on actual observations of the situation.
But employees who tele we were not there to see it ...
They were there to take pictures shock, because the topic of the show was already selected, and the thesis would be promoted: people of the cities are dangerous thugs, lawless. The cities are lawless areas inhabited by wild ...
From there, it does not interest them to talk to smart people and good faith.
They had violence, sensationalism.
You should have seen as turning the clock: they seemed more concerned that they did not get the images they were looking for.
Their wage depended on: they had pictures of violence and savagery ...
How it ended?
Generally, they were moving away from the city, returning to their truck, while some of their accomplices would arrange with the kids most wineries and most cons of the city.
The deal was very simple! It's always easy to find a bunch of little gogolitos who want to play hard and get on TV! If necessary a small 50-franc note could help ...
Thus the most gutless suddenly found themselves promoted "gang leaders" of the city.
And the guys were going to give journalists for their money (some biftons 50 francs).
These guys were young virgins who had intended to remain so for quite some time saw their IQ, suddenly found themselves turning rapists! Glory!
Absolutely not credible to those of the city acknowledged that despite the blurred face!
Journalists often arrive with a script, and asked the youths to repeat several times their natural role in staying! Here we were bottomed in the manipulation! The will was blatantly fake! What Ethics!
But it was scary to France looking M6, TF1 and France 2.
These guys who were cut as shrimp and nobody feared were described as dangerous gangsters ...
Shame!
After some kind of scam (he must believe that journalists were passing the word on the cities where you could easily find good pictures for cheap), the situation was clear: the journalists were persona non grata in the city ...
And everything I can advise people of all cities is to host with flour and eggs from journalists looking for sensational images!
racist campaigns on TV: Arab aggressors and black rapists thieves, innocent Jewish victims of hate islamobamboula free republic threatened
Benoit Dusquenes is perfectly complicit in the racist campaigns that are commonplace in the media. On the one hand everything is done to certify the fact that blacks and Arabs are Semitic French, the other Jews are threatened, victims!
crying in this story is probably so fake that Elie Chouraqui on antisemitism Youth Montreuil!
I could not watch the report to the end so it reeks of manipulation and incitement to racism!
Watch it with a critical eye and you will see: not a single insult or assault filmed. While it claims that it happens every day ... How the journalist made to swallow the pill? He claims that he was forbidden to film out of school (when where daily attacks would occur) for safety issues. The journalist does so no critical inquiry and relies exclusively on the version presented to him!
Anthology citation:
"without widespread anti-Semitism is the fact 98% of immigrants" "young Jews were attacked by blacks and Arabs" or
this young Betar is presented as a big brother who watches over kids and who swears he does not have weapons (though, nunchaku, batons and bottles of acid are common, if not a military arsenal at home Raphael Shoeman "collector" of AK47 and bazookas).
Good confess, I could not go through with the show!
Besides poor Jews necessarily victims, look a bit the look of "terrorists" that we sell M6
These guys are ridiculous, but they wear a beard and a jellaba and they are afraid, it is sufficient to Forbidden Zone. We're in the big manip huge here!
Examples so I can get out dozens whatsoever on "Special Envoy", "The Right to Know", "further investigation", "Forbidden Zone" and so on. By
cons never a word about the Jewish Mafia and Operation Plant Banks who misappropriated billion francs (probably not far from the billion euros) to Israel.
There are times when it is modest on the ethnic and religious backgrounds on TV!
Another video for the road: on turning!
Not a victim of being interviewed, no, but a girl who's afraid (probably too you it looks on TV). Yet it is boys who should be afraid when she verbally insulted by a guy, she comes down with a butcher knife!
She is afraid because she is easy prey: she is French (the others are not, of course!). She would have liked to be Arab would have been a big brother and respect!
And the two idiots in the car! Ha they certainly did not have their certificate of studies both here!
Fear of power: union of citizens 'basic', Jews, blacks, whites, Arabs against the plutocracy and a true Republic. Strategy: divide and conquer, with the help of the media and racism
So that just by listening to leading questions and the tone used by the journalist who asked France2 KS for further investigation, I quickly concluded that she was there to film a skid.
It is clear that the stresses gradually as time passes, bringing on KS questions of identity, race, what he thinks of France etc..
She expected him to spit on the Jews, or failing that at least he spit on France.
He must at all costs to the idea of black anti-Semite, or failing that of black anti-white racist.
Unfortunately, the response of KS on French identity would have agreed with him the more chauvinistic of French self-proclaimed "native"!
Danger! What would happen if the French "native" began to appreciate and respect these "dark factions" that desperate to present it as their worst enemies?
It would not be that the populations that we handle and pushes hate to realize that they can discuss and understand each other!
No, he is pushing everyone into a corner of the paranoid!
Thus the media, a hand for years denounced the anti-Arab racism and anti-black "ethnic French" basically xenophobic, collaborators, racist, antisemitic and incidentally all the fantasies that béhaliens you will, while on the other hand, the same media also denounced for years the danger of communalism "black", the "ethnic gangs" black or Arab, basically Francophobe, blancophobes, sociophobes, incidentally antisemitic fantasies finkielkrautiens and all we want.
It will be understood, the only racism "disturbing" and common to both "ethnic French collaborators" rather than "anti-Zionist islamobamboulas-Semitic" is the only supposed anti-Semitism.
For Anti-Semitism (and often assumed surfantasmé, baked and annealed) is above all! Anyway this is what they would have us believe in a post I point you in prépartion inconsistencies of these intellectuals who supposedly are hunting Semitic, though they do not hesitate to defend ex-Nazi (and therefore real antisemites with Jewish blood on their hands) when it suits them, while they deal with some Nazis of those who fought them against Nazism during the Second World War. For in reality the supposed fight against anti-Semitism is a tool used to justify the most cynical political agenda!
But what about the instrumentalization of anti-Semitism, racism, chauvinism etc.. deserves a full ticket (may be tomorrow, stay tuned).
Anyway if time Mitterand media seemed more concerned with fighting against the fascist threat of FN (Jospin admits in the video later that this was the can and guilt and manipulation to occuppe the field) and defend "lénoirélezarabes" threatened by the racism of rednecks, now under Sarkozy is the reverse occurs: the media rise in anti-white racism supposed mayonnaise and a supposed anti-Semitism in the suburbs which will prove equally untrue that the fascist threat of the 80s.
The purpose of all this? Divide and conquer. While they were mounting a class of people against another, it prevents the emergence on the political scene in front of the real issues of substance.
Yesterday SOS Racisme was trying to manipulate young people (tickets will be allocated), now we can no longer handle, they openly struggle against them, evidence that the official anti-racism has always been that fraud (since they are the same people who yesterday caressed, and now clap).
Bibendum Dray: racism is my job! Hin Hin! Thank you all lunch!
I will more fully on these issues but know that both the fight against anti-Semitism, the fight against racism, or sarkozyenne defense of national identity, are only scams to deceive the maximum citizens, putting them in conflict with each other in struggles sterile leaving hands free to those who act. Jews, blacks, Arabs, whites will in turn set the agenda for the opposition next time.
Thus it will appear the following conjunctions:
Jewish, Arab and black against white racist and anti-Semitic villains (SOS Racisme)
whites against blacks and Jews and Arab anti-white racist and antisemitic (current position of the media)
Jews and black cons Arab and white slavers (revisionist position on slavery like "We're all black Jews" supported by TMF or OPG inducted by Elkabbach)
Jews, Arabs, whites against blacks bloody dangerous (Petion "David, Sebastian, Kader "against anti-white racism in the course represented by Mamadou)
One can imagine other configurations depending on the political agenda of the moment.
Anyway we see that Jews are used loosely. Unscrupulous manipulation! Unfortunately, few Jews are realizing ...
Carabosse: political prostitution and submission to the king money!
Anyway, KS has avoided the trap shoes and proves one thing: a coherent and well argued, not hate and reconciling whites, blacks and Arabs (all victims of the same manipulators because after all we forget there were white slaves in France at the same time there were black slaves and indigenous: the serfs and workers, miners and other proletarians treated like the last shit ...) has no chance of pass through the media.
Indeed, the media are there to control the social sphere and divide.
What would have happened if the days of colonialism massively dominated the blacks, Arabs, Vietnamese, Malagasy and whites had been able to transcend the artificial divisions to fight against the powers of money who enslaved them?
At the time it was more difficult barriers of language and communication facilities.
Now that the news travels at the speed of the internet, and that English is heavily spoken, such a conjunction between peoples is possible.
Without going too far, such a combination is feasible in France, even among populations that grow to hate each other.
It is time to stop foolishly fall into the trap of division.
Racism is good for weak minds! There will always were Christian Islamophobes, Negrophobes, Francophobe, Judeophobia, etc. Arabophobia. We can not do anything about it! Until these morons are still at the margin the better! The only racism that is used, it is the oligarchs which by all means seek to divide the human cattle for better control. Let us not behave like cattle!
And what I say at the level of false racial divisions is also true for false political divisions!
Those who manipulate us by all means, we proved today that the UMP and the PS have been complicit and have never formed a single political oligarchy which shares power forever. This is perfectly clear in the little game that engages and Sarkozy has the merit of dropping the mask!
Therefore Dieudonné is also fiercely opposed by the media!
It is popular and likely to open the eyes of many people, especially young!
It transcends racial divisions and political dares challenge the instrumentalization of the Holocaust
It represents the true left and proved it by shaking hands with Le Pen, that despite the divisions color, race, politics, all we could talk and talk so as a citizen, even when we disagree, and without going into insults and ideological struggles that merely pointing to each other and and maintain the division among the French! He proved that a black could shake the hand of a so-called fascist without fluff, and vice versa!
short, by his speeches and actions, it undermines the whole ideological edifice that subtle ways of 1000, French citizens are divided and thus can not effectively fight for their rights!
censored KS to further investigation: Reflections on the global oligarchy because of the miseries of the world
I diffuse this interview with Kemi Seba and friends of his that I find interesting in more ways than one.
I must first say that I'm not black, let alone not Kemite. By
cons for years I started thinking about the injustice of the world, the dominant-dominated relationship, being interested in the shady politics and history, but also to human nature and animal and the religion of universal domination is money.
Although I am extremely critical vis-à-vis the media, I am like everyone else, however, vulnerable to brainwashing. So I had to some extent been influenced by this image of Nazi black as the media wants to stick to the skin of KS. I do not know if it is based, I do not think, so the media call Nazi easily while those opposed to the doctrinaire double standard. But I must say that without knowing the words nor the ideas of KS, I tended to distrust. And we must say that I understand nothing Kemite Folklore, etc. hotep. Which makes me think the resurgence of paganism, Druidism etc. identity among whites (knowing that all these modes of neo-paganism, Wicca, Druidism etc. are often controlled by sects such as Scientology, Freemasonry etc..). So the sectarian aspect tended to push me away ... And he had a reputation for anti-Semitic sacred! But after all, what a freethinker is not messin not anathema supreme?
Anyway people are judged first on their statements, then their actions ...
And I must say that I recognize myself in what is said in the video by the various stakeholders, with some nuances. I will return. When acts of KS, the future will tell us what it is. But the main
in these ideas is that KS does not fall into the trap of racial opposition. It has been too often portrayed as a racist anti-white.
This is not "whites" he accused, but the oligarchs!
And I can only agree with him!
Who are the oligarchs? Those who over time have become so rich that they no longer even try to raise capital, they create, by usurping the sovereign powers previously (monopoly of kings) of minting coins.
Today it is a small group of private banks, discrete but very powerful because the basic global monetary system, who have usurped this power, violating the democracies because a democracy that did not control his economy has no political power, and is only a puppet in the hands of bankers.
capitalization of these banks seem paltry compared to the amount of capital in circulation, or relative to the capitalization of other banks, but it is an illusion: almost all capital outstanding is that the virtual currency that does not exist. Crisis and the amount of capital may find themselves squeezed, and all other banks in ruins, while revealing the disproportionate power of those handles bank behind the central banks.
The only thing that there are debts. Including the debts of States.
But when it comes to debts of the States everybody tends to think that if there are states in debt, then there are the creditor States, foremost among them the U.S. center of the global economy ...
False: The U.S. State is the most indebted in the world.
Beneficiaries: small clique of private banks at the base of globalization.
They impose their policies to the world through the IMF, World Bank, WTO, EU, NATO, UN etc.. which are all instruments increasingly discredited because they mislead about their true nature.
They decide wars and genocides against the peoples (Iraq I, embargo, Iraq II: 2 million dead low range ... Not to mention the rest of the world ...).
Believe it or not, but they have intervened in the wars world, the Bolshevik Revolution (they are above the divisions capitalist / communist and use of all ideologies to increase their power, including the recent patterns of ecology, humanitarian etc..), they were very active under Napoleon, but also during the French Revolution (bourgeois revolution), the English Revolution (ditto), the fall of the Czar by the Bolsheviks, the fall of the caliph by the Young Turks (most Freemasons) etc..
Conspiracy? The term is legitimate only when those in power (usually valet oligarchs) accuses his opponents necessarily terrorists. The
KS oligarchs mentioned above are ideologies, religions above (even if officially they conveniently appear as supporters of this ideology, or followers of any religion). They are above even money (the best instrument of social control).
But very often to silence any criticism against them they hide behind "Jews and Money", using as a screen of some of their accomplices "who call themselves Jews but are not, but are a synagogue of Satan "to quote the Bible (Apocalypse of St. John). At this rate fall into the trap of gross anti-Semitic hatred is back in their game, and it would make them too happy.
Are they omnipotent?
NO.
Their power is an illusion that only works as long as we continue to foolishly walk in the combined, ie continue to obey the control system by which money is a widespread control by debt.
Oh sure, they can use states as puppets and use armies of so-called sovereign countries for their wars.
Today it is clear that the U.S. Army is led astray by a clique of private interests mélant Israeli lobby, lobby oil and military-industrial lobby ...
But it was the same when the British Royal Navy was used by Sassoon to go to the Opium War in China.
was the same when merchants and industrial lobbies (conversion of old money négrières) pushed the French government to send the army in North Africa and Black Africa to seize the resources of the mother continent. Same in Indochina. So yes
States U.S., British, French and more generally to colonial and imperialist were complicit in these oligarchs.
But since when are they people? Who can believe that Bush represents the American people who are against the war in Iraq, and who were against the U.S. entered the war in both World Wars. If tomorrow Sarkouchner send our soldiers to Iran, will represent the French people-you it?
The real danger that fear the oligarchs is a real wave of revolutions (or armed through the ballot box), which gives sovereignty to the people.
They have eradicated the old order, abolishing all the royal power, and abolish the old religious powers (marginalization of the Church, eradication of the Caliphate).
They implanted the power of banks to place in the West, and one-party dictatorship in the East (which from the beginning have cynically deal together). Now the banks' power extends everywhere ... Globalization is presented as inevitable ...
How to fight? It's simple: Chavez in every country! Chavez is a Venezuelan "native" who loves his country and his people and who believes in God (even if it does not crawl before the Pope).
If Chavez were everywhere, we could all work out in bypassing the banks.
It cancels the debts of everyone! The banks are ruined! We care about the oligarchs in prison: they all go to a true IPT. Although
sure it will not happen at least not all at once ... Then he must pray that these sovereign peoples who fight for their dignity, ultimately prevail over the oligarchs.
is why we are naturally attracted to small countries such as Venezuela, Bolivia, Lebanon, Palestine, Iraq or Iran ...
Over there the face of the oligarchs has shown so hideous that people are fighting for their dignity and sovereignty, each time with the alliance that fear as the oligarchs: the religious sense (including the idea of sacrifice ), and the love of their land and independence, whether Christian or Muslims, South American or Eastern.
In Europe no risk, a sense of the sacred has disappeared, let alone the meaning of sacrifice, when the love of his country, it is automatically suspect of collusion with the extreme right. Only when we called Gallo, Sarkozy, or Finkielkraut it is possible to adopt a speech patriot without the permission of the CRIF, we take the risk of being a Nazi if you do it.
unilateral cancellation of debt, international laws to counteract the power of money which may total sovereignty of peoples ...
is why the Israeli-Palestinian conflict so attracted our attention as we are all, we feel that this war is played down the symbolic power of globalization that crushes peoples, cultivations, dignities ...
the outcome of this battle depends the hope of the world. Until the Palestinians are resisting, there is hope for all ...
But back to the video. Why
France 2 wanted to interview KS?
For self-poisoned by their own propaganda, they took him to an idiot who would hate to give them what they wanted to show in their reporting racist blacks dangerous, advocating hate speech, which illustrate the danger blacks for the Republic.
Questions posed by the biased journalist, and the tone in which she poses leave no doubt.
No luck, they did not expect a course on human rights, double standards, and the oligarchy that rules the mafia world, especially the third world.
I was not expecting it either!
Obviously they did not broadcast a story that
1) say inconvenient truths
2) could give a positive view of KS, which desperately needs to pass for a monster
Now I bring nuance to the discourse on French identity ...
From the moment the French government has fallen into the trap of domination over other nations, its identity has changed. She likes it or not!
Already, the France national entity is a modern construction. Even today, many Bretons, Basques, Corsicans, etc. of Savoy. feel Breton, Basque, Corsican, Savoy, and only after French ... A few generations ago, they felt only Breton, Corsican, Basque, etc.. and not really French!
So already we hear much about what I mean French. What relationship between Basque and an Alsatian?
If these identities have been integrated into the French melting pot, so why not the others, the ex-colonized, with no more chooses to be attached to France than the regional (except that the colonized were subjects, and regional citizens ...). A
magrhébin the third generation, married to a French-born European who do not speak the language, there has never set foot, and does not go live, we can say that it is French, at least as much English as the third generation, that we do not claim to account for the second generation because he is white and Christian.
The main problem with North Africans, Afro-Caribbean or Asian and that on their skin or in their names, they wear their extra-European origins, and it is not easy to change the perception of others. Now
speech KS does not bother me: it does not feel French, and he feels attached to a home country (Benin I think), it is perfectly right.
you one Demands to French living in the USA, England or anywhere else they deny France?
Willing to submit to you they are not such a choice?
Ribbe, Beyala, Kelman ... confusion in the anti-negrophobia
I just have a look at the site of Claude Ribbe ... Especially on his blog.
I have always found Mr. Ribbe said on his blog and his books very interesting things ...
And I always regretted that Ribbe never take advantage to Dieudonné. Dieudonné is not because black, but because Dieudonne denounced his words to him, which denounces with Ribbe his prose Normale in his blog and his books.
See next issue which is fried Ribbe Gallo cons who monopolizes the issue to justify the horrors! We see that Ribbe is particularly pugnacious, and is a victim of the same opponents and the same methods as Dieudonné.
review the way the entire program, we see how the word Ribbe and Ramadan is respected by the little néosionistes involved in the issue, as Gallo burp like a Nazi, cutting the floor constantly spewing outright or Valls on Ramadan.
So obviously, unlike Confident Ribbe, never daring to cross the yellow line which is to address the unspeakable. He does not do it by focusing on individuals such as Finkielkraut for example, but losing sight of Fink is that the interchangeable cog in a system, and it is far more effective to attack the heart system.
But the truth is that when Dieudonné had the lobby on the coat, they all did in their pants!
Ribbe him, had treated Dieudo clown and participated in its way to discredit the message by attacking the messenger ... When asked about Dieudo he came out of this embarrassing issue that wants to television is required that blacks condemn the maroons, pretending not to be interested in what it said "clown" who, n has not referred Normal Sup ', could not have interesting opinions on the matter. Elitist way of thinking put on the shelf and the claims for billions of human beings on earth who will never have the chance to pursue higher education.
But I must concede that at least did not Ribbe responsible for timely Dieudo get a place in the media.
He could have done.
That would have been pointless, as the examples of opportunistic Beyala Kelman and demonstrate, but he could be tempted ...
If not defended Dieudonne, at least he has not been too bad against him! Because
Beyala and Kelman them in terms of careerism more or less awkward ...
Beyala were extenuating circumstances: at the time she went with Drucker and hoped to get married by Michel, who saw him in this story of a banal story buttocks.
Vexed since the Drucker has dampened hopes of an upstart, Beyala found a slightly more combative speech that I have seen betrayal by denouncing his romance in a book, which will benefit "strangely" not TV promo, and also through his statements against Zoe's Ark.
But it was completely discredited, and at least blow the whistle at the slightest promise of a folding seat in sight, it will start to spit on the Maroons as Dieudonné who dare to attack the system of thought unique double standard.
Kelman is to put this together that Beyala, he was offered access to TV and a promo for his unexpected books in exchange for his anti-Dieudonne charges.
Curiously he will return to his accusations anti-Dieudonne on RMC radio, and even adopt a tone of protest to defend some of his ideas ... Maybe he had seen on the Internet that the sites black community thought of him? No matter because after that he changed several more times to review the matter, without knowing the reason for his inconsistency. Anyway, Kelman has lost all credibility as Beyala. Now they have come to serve, I doubt if the system proves grateful saw the ingratitude that characterizes ... Kelman and Beyala will therefore betrays the anti-negrophobia for less than nothing, worse than Judas who had received his 30-denier ... Let's go to
Ribbe: well stronger than Dieudonne (which uses humor and provocative), it attacks the negrophobia through long demonstrations bookish and scholarly, but unlike Dieudonné who attacks all forms of racism (at negrophobia anti-African Anti-Caribbean, but also Arabophobia, Islamophobia, Zionism, etc..) Claude Ribbe confined to the anti-Caribbean negrophobia that it seems ...
I say that it seems to me because I think he adopts contradictory attitudes on the subject. He has long held alongside the Collective Dom, and Patrick Karam that hump now with Sarkozy. I do not know exactly what relationship he had with Karam (thank you for informing me in forum, I think they had clashed), but in any case Karam, the "black issue" does not arise: in the name of the citizenship that distinguishes blind no color among its citizens ...
is really nice, but in fact must be recognized that a black who is denied housing or a job because he is black, regardless of whether West Indian citizen so for centuries, or African freshly landed.
But in a lot of West Indians still prevails that vision that has been imposed by the settler, it is the rejected children of Africa, that Africans did not want them and that is why Africans would have "sold" to the French slavers. Method abject destruction of the identity of a victim by making it guilty of his own misfortunes. Method unfortunately as old as the world and we can see in action in Iraq, Palestine, Lebanon, Iran tomorrow, yesterday throughout Africa, Asia etc. colonial times. But if indeed
African tribes took part in the transatlantic slave trade, we must know that they had no choice. A bit like the neo-colonial Africa has not chosen to live in misery ...
You should know that before the emergence of African kings, the African coast Atlantic fought slavers. They were the first victims of trafficking.
And it is because their struggle became increasingly effective, and therefore capture slaves returning more and more expensive than the slave traders have decided to finance "black kings" in their pay, which are the ancestors current African dictators, responsible for selling the black slave traders in exchange for firearms, which gave them an advantage over neighboring tribes they were going to raid, but in exchange for worthless beads and rum imported from West Indies.
The system of negro kings was imposed across Africa as the system is imposed dictators today ...
The trial is being done to Africans is a mock trial in a largely ... That does not mean there is no responsibility on the African side: we need to separate things and distinguish active collaborators with the victims of this system. But do not confuse the collaborator with the payer. Just as it is a mock trial to say "the French" are slavers. Behind this "the" generalizing very convenient, lies a few families of the bourgeoisie and nobility who became the great capitalists of the modern era. Accumullé on capital the backs of slaves and colonized over the centuries, including metropolitan white slaves who worked in factories or mines, now finds himself converted in cases more or less "serious", but has not been squandered . As long as we continue to say "French", "Arabs", "blacks" or "Jews" were slaveholders, they will be accused of anti-French racism, anti-everything and prevent research on the real owners of the money accumulated at the expense of human misery.
Aparté passage: Dieudonné has been sentenced for allegedly said "Jews are slave "as he never said it, but he spoke of militia racists who were assaulting her audience in Lyon, saying" those who attack me are slave ...". But even if 'he had said "Jews are slave ...", I do not see how it's more racist than saying that it was blacks or Arab slave traders, as one hears all the time in the media . His conviction is therefore entirely political and not based on anything.
But back in to Ribbe: he dithers, he squirms, it's OK to tackle negrophobia but in his corner, and especially not on the side of infréquentables as Dieudonné, would not it party to be treated as anti-Semitic turn. Claude yet do not worry, now that the fate of Dieudonné is set, it will be your turn to go through it.
Because the tactic is simple slave, she walks and has also been applied successfully in the Arab or the Vietminh.
This is divide and conquer.
It was far easier to attack a lobby Dieudo isolated Beyala an insulated, isolated Kelman, an isolated Ribbe, a Confident insulated etc etc rather than a block that is sustained in anti-negrophobia despite the divisions and disputes that may occur internally.
Probably Claude Ribbe answer that does not recognize the Ogres, he was asked if the issue publicly, as the Ogres are victims of the campaign's false accusations have to suffer Dieudonné.
But just read what he thinks of Olivier Petre-Grenouilleau and Pap N'dyaye bail black, to know that he thinks the same thing as us. Ogres have also been the first to denounce OPG, when it was made public mention of its work in issuing Elkabbach on Public-Sénat.
All this is unfortunately policy: we have seen, Claude Ribbe has thought through he would have the blessing of Bayrou for legislative ...
Under these conditions, OK to terminate, but without going too hard and not appear too close to the "Semitic" imagined, especially as it appeared at Sarcelles where the Jewish vote is very powerful.
Claude, know that I saw the show where we saw you shake hands at the market and distributing leaflets, putting up posters ... Sorry to say, but I felt sorry for you ... Obviously you still hoping to have the imprimatur Bayrou's party, and without doubt it was the show to attract his attention ...
qu'Ogre As I knew already that it does be useless: OK, for free labor, distribution of leaflets etc.. By cons believe that you would be rewarded for your efforts Billposters it be naive in politics. All played in the background, and you had already accumulated a liability that you went beyond the pale.
Especially within the party that Bayrou you great enemies, as you Lozes love so much cutting.
The impression it gives me all this: Too much dithering, the Afro-Caribbean revolve around the bush too, instead of block Negrophobia cons.
In the fight against anti-Semitism, the Jewish community rallied each time, including when they are embedded in mock battles and handling. It is the opposite extreme of what can be seen in blacks.
Jews of all stripes and persuasions different can come together to march against anti-Semitism, be it fantasy or exaggeration.
blacks who have good reasons to march (how many dead burnt black in slums owned by slumlords or killed in police brutality?) do not because they are divided, or the so called \\ becaufe representative associations actually represent anything.
Representativeness blacks could possibly be done by the convergence of media and intellectual personalities, artists, sportsmen, writers, philosophers, historians, etc..
And that's where I was going with this article: Claude Ribbe think in the back lot of the things said Dieudonne in his sketches or her controversial statements. I'm sure the bottom Claude Ribbe fully agrees with this idea of "slave converted in the bank." Dieudonne said under the influence of emotion after the attack on his audience, and after being treated dirty negro, but his statements are not based on anything! Claude Ribbe who is an expert on Haitian history necessarily know the history of Gradis, these wealthy Jews who built their fortunes on the sugar industry and the slave trade in Santo Domingo, while the French crown jewels. Inevitably the return of Dieudonné would remind him of certain episodes in the history of Haiti. But it is clear that he preferred not to brave the media storm and stand back from this story. Without taking too openly sided with Dieudonne he could simply say that Dieudonne was right ... Only Rosa Amelia Plummelle-Uribe dare do so. Even if it was not publicized, it is to his credit for having done so.
There will be no representation of blacks, as blacks to the black profile will remain their separate ways.
Whether you like it or not, you artists, intellectuals, athletes who represent the black with the rest of the population ...
If you are unable to support each other when you negrophobia insidious campaign rages against one of you, so do not come crying to the fact that nothing changes.
Dieudonné had it fully understood the role that was his, not only as black but as a spokesperson for all the voiceless, the outcasts, the marginalized. That's why it was and continues to be (although now boycotting the media) on all fronts against racism. He did not spare him his solidarity with others, not hesitating to lend his theater to lecture or serve as a meeting.
This union is essential, and would be around the Dieudonné and cons his lynching, which announced simply sidelined blacks who have things to say.
But she has not made and will not happen and that's unfortunate. The case
Dieudonne has been the developer of it.
The media strategy is perfectly clear now that Dieudonné is sidelined and that Sarkozy won the elections: the claims of racist blacks do not interest anyone. Dieudo exit, exit Ribbe and the little black personalities that had something to say about racism (as Lilian Thuram, who had the opportunity to say things very fair but we no longer see either).
Today blacks are highlighted are those who read the teleprompter and an angel face but the farm (as Roselmack ...), or else are blacks who are politically correct jokes (Fabrice Eboue ...). The
