Herpes Outbreak And Exercises

Hillary Clinton give a damn scared! The least worst scenario U.S. for the world ...


I am very closely the Democratic primary campaign in the U.S., thanks to this that said AJM, A2N , and KamerunScoop who comment daily.

One thing bothers me terribly in this country is racism oozing from Hillary to try to stop the march of Obama.

Similarly, the indulgence of the media vis-à-vis the missteps and false notes campaigns of Hillary (and also McCain), and their severity vis-à-vis those of Obama speaks volumes .

Seen from my chair, with the info I have here is what emerges:

Obama who voted against the war in Iraq, which holds the least militaristic discourse of this campaign (unlike McCain and Clinton who play it will be the most warlike, who best embodies the national war leader, in a rhetoric that not not deny a future German Chancellor in the field), is ultimately the candidate most consistent and who has committed the fewest fouls in this campaign. So much to look really far, and inflate really blame him for something.

Because it is far from genocide and calls the Zionist crusade pastors McCain. It is far from the threat of annihilation from Iran of candidate Hillary. It is far allusions thinly veiled racist that Obama must pass.

Personally when I see a picture of Hillary, chills run through my spine.

His smile was cold and inhuman great lengths to hide the feelings that inhabit it, including the hatred she seems to feel for Obama.

Hillary Clinton: McCain as an opportunist willing to do anything (including the genocide of the Iranians) to satisfy their pathetic ambitions.

This woman is clearly an opportunist of the worst kind: one to exploit anything and everything for her private life into a film and media to give a certain image supposed to promote it in the media.

Example: at the time it was frowned upon not to be belligerent (because of accusations of anti-patriotism of Bush), she passed all the appropriations for the war in Iraq, giving Bush carte blanche.

Today, still in the same vein, it calls for strike on Iran off the map.

can understand such a speech from McCain, who as a Republican candidate and heir to the Bush doctrine, can not afford to talk of breaking and disown the actions of the government without discrediting the little credit it remains the official discourse neo-conservative. Namely that war was necessary, it is good, and that the U.S. is trying to win. McCain even said he was prepared to stay in Iraq another 100 years if necessary, that may be used against him in a campaign video. At this point, McCain was a prisoner from the Bush record: he is prohibited from recognizing the mistakes of the president still in office. On the other hand, he faces the huge unpopularity of the war among American voters.

It's hard to understand, however, that Hillary, who in principle did not take the decisions of the Bush administration (even if she has all voted, it would not the first time a candidate lied about his past votes), insists on this line hawkish and anti-Islam.

Obama is the one of the 3 has the least hawkish speech, even if to please the lobbyists, he is obliged to make concessions.

But back a little behind in my blog a few months ago I published the names of advisers who were hiding behind each candidate.

Gold in American democracy (and now in French democracy is the same), candidates are only the media relays to those who put them on stage and tell them what to say.

This also explains how a Former HYPP 70s, anti-militarist and anti-Vietnam War and is now transforming into standard-bearer of the clash of civilizations and the war against Iran: as would happen, Hillary has married all causes currently popular: when anti-militarist opinion is, when Islamophobic and hawkish opinion is. If tomorrow the American public becomes anti-Semitic after seeing the ruin of their economy and the American place in the world because of the wars Israel has managed to sell it (Iraq, Syria, Iran can ...), imagine that Clinton will become the worst anti-Semites in America. There is still room before get there.

behind the presidential candidates?

So who are the consultants behind the candidates?

To name a few, representative: Kissinger is very close to McCain. Yet Kissinger, although it is often passed from darkness to light and vice versa, is part of the cornerstones of American foreign policy planners of the war in Viet Nam, sexton of it after all hope of win or lose (the Nobel committee will even hutzpah to award the Nobel Peace Prize for that! Just as if we had given a Nobel peace with Hitler for having signed the armistice!) great organizer (or disorganizing all depends on your point of view) of political life in South America, this pure representative of the American-Zionist Mafia will no doubt guide the McCain's political choices.

Kissinger has often been opposed to the neocons, but it is a token opposition: Kissinger had his Iraq has him in Viet Nam, and since he is a supporter of illegal shenanigans (such as support for dictators south america, false attacks attributed to his ideological enemies etc..) than by direct intervention. But in reality, Kissinger neocons or the same vein: imperialists, Zionists, not shrinking from no method, no genocide. That the massacres were committed by U.S. military or mercenaries paid in U.S. dollars after all ... Besides McCain has recovered its share of "thinkers" neoconservatives.

Indeed, neoconservatives, to be sure not to lose the hand, were scattered across the American political spectrum. Normally, they come from extreme left, are former Trotskyist (which just reinforces all the documentation linking the Trotskyists to the CIA, and imperialism Zionist, something too often ignored by the militant leftist base who really believe in his cause when it is often a screen). They are returned to the left, and some are behind the Democrats. As good

Pharisees, they even have the hutzpah to acknowledge the defeat of Bush and the stalemate in Iraq, while it is they who have done everything to provoke this war!

They decidedly lacking a nerve! Who found

-you one behind Clinton? Always the same damned soul: Albright. This little old lady with false air is a terrible criminal harmless against humanity, which wash hands with the blood of 1 million 500 thousand Iraqis killed because of the embargo it has imposed, including over 500,000 children under 5 years (UN figures).

Undoubtedly more Zionist than Kissinger, Albright feels ready to continue its work in the shade. It should be remembered that at the time of Bill Clinton, his government and cabinet was considered as one comprising most of the Zionists. They have retained their influence in the Bush administration, and thus seem prepared to stay with the future government, whether Democrat or Republican.

Who you one behind Obama? Zbigniew Brezinsky (sorry for spelling). He too is a perfectly cynical eminence grise. Under Carter, he had laid the foundations of the war between the Soviet Union and Afghanistan, and helped (with the help of Bush's father) to establish Al Qaeda. He is a convinced imperialist, and is extremely wary of Russia and China, the main rivals of the USA on the world stage.
By cons, it was one of the few policies of his level to accuse the Bush administration and the neocons to manipulate public opinion around September 11 and the war against terrorism. Normal: it is well placed to know what lies behind Al Qaeda ...

And he also knows very well that the current wars in which bogged the U.S. will only accelerate its ruin and destruction. Not that he is against intervention, but Brezinsky has always been an advocate of soft power: rather than intervening directly, are appealing to the manipulation, scheming, terrorism, put up traps.

is less expensive, and officially the U.S. keep hands clean.

Brezinsky has been one of the architects of the coming to power of Ayatollah Khomeini in Iran to topple the Shah who showed an inclination independence on its oil. The U.S. government thought it would be easier to manipulate than a clan of Islamists like the Shah. Big mistake on their part, the Islamists have cleverly used the asylum provided by the West (Khomeini was hosted in France, Neaufles-le-Chateau near Paris, and during his military service, the young Nicolas Sarkozy himself will even served as a guard). Then once in power, they still rejected the flange smarter than trying to impose American imperialist power ...

And yes: the Iranian revolution of 1979 would have to be made a false revolution, since that the real U.S. outsourcers to continuing to lead in sub-hands.

This proves also the hypocrisy of American discourse on Iran's Ayatollahs: Iran if the Islamists had agreed to cooperate with the CIA, they would now be best friends the Americans. All

will not go as planned, and then the Americans will do another puppet of the time, Saddam Hussein in Iraq, the outbreak of the Iran-Iraq war. Which finally gonna make the Israeli agenda. They are strong anyway! Saddam, who will once again roll in flour in 1990 by throwing himself on the agreement with Kuwait tacit U.S.. Decidedly he took the time to understand who the real enemies!

the least worst scenario for the U.S. and the world?

I summarizes the situation thus: if win McCain or Clinton, there is a big risk that the war in Iraq continue and even expand into Iran.

In Iran if it happens, this will be in the form of bombing: first because the U.S. military can not afford to lead a third invasion. On the other hand, because it is the preferred approach of Kissinger and Albright. It Albright who was behind the embargo and bombings Iraqi civilians in the period of the 90s, not to mention the bombing against Yugoslavia.

Bombing is clean and tidy, it is cheap in U.S. troops, it began not too much political capital within the USA.



Kissinger is too dumb to send the army on the ground either.

Or should imagine a huge coalition, a real that one, to go into Iran.

should therefore be a huge reason, as a major terrorist attack or a deadly clash with Israel (even purely staged), for such a coalition could short-circuiting the world opinion that would be obviously against the war (despite years of propaganda against Iran).

If Obama wins cons, it would return to clandestine methods (indeed the only ones that go against terrorist groups, but the war on terror is a huge hypocrisy).
Presumably with Obama, the prestige of the USA is a small health redo, with the end of direct armed intervention, while at the same time, all former U.S. barbouzards networks in the Middle East are reactivated in nbtamment Iran.

This obviously would result in deaths, there escape not by U.S. friendly dictatorships, or democracies U.S. puppet and friends, so in the end by a larger imperialism.

must recognize the consequence to the U.S. military interventionism in recent years: it has a lot of deaths (more than one million Iraqis have died), he also ruined, and especially the U.S. economy and international standing of this country who no longer represents freedom, but barbarism. If they continue on this path, it will soon collapse.

While they adopt a smarter tactic, it takes even for decades of imperialism sneaky!

So what is the least worst candidate?

all depends on perspective.

If we want to avoid direct wars, it's probably Obama. But at the cost of restoring a certain American imperialism is in decline since Bush.

by cons can count on McCain or Clinton for going to war in place of Israel, which has immediate implications dramatic: hundreds of thousands (even millions) of innocent dead.

But on the other side without doubt the ultimate ruin of the former American power.

Another question must be asked: how Obama as a president you it will oppose the U.S. Zionist lobby?

A president who opposes it does not weigh much, and this explains why Obama like others, tries to please them, increasing goodwill gestures.

You can see a simple calculation, not acted upon if they win ...

Hard to know if Obama is as corruptible as the others, despite his good head to keep his place if he needs to nuke Iran, that will decide on?

and if he chooses the path of humanity and denies the wicked war, is what he will still be allowed to continue to chair, or even live?

After all, a scandal can easily get out! Besides, you can bet that no perfect candidate can reach that level: the mafia who pull the strings must always keep an ace up their sleeve to blackmail.

And if that does not, there remains the option of 2 IQ of extreme American right, which organizes an attack worthy of the best secret service in the world, beating all the protections, all fonts, all services to accommodate shot in the head of his target, or to plant a bomb in his vehicle. 2 of IQ will be killed or murdered in turn by a citizen in love with vengeance. Figure

ultra classic erases all traces, and occupy the media for months!

One final note though: I wrote all that ignores the massive fraud which is anticipated in the presidential election. Not to mention all the arrangements and scheming behind the scenes imaginable (electors, Supreme Court ...). All

may well be only a stage for holding the audience spellbound into believing that democracy is on.

As if that is the choice of the next president is already ...

Moss Green Cardigan Sweater

Hoax Islamophobic literature, media and film ... Petite video sympa

How sucker for having believed and still believe in these fables énormissimes?

The revelation about the falsehood of the book and film "Surviving With Wolves" last week, made me revisit on other hoaxes which I had particularly marked in previous years, but which were soon forgotten.

For example, everyone remembers the book by Betty Mahmoody "Not Without My Daughter", but who knows it was a hoax Islamophobic tailor-made for Reagan's America to feed the hatred and stereotypes cons Muslims in general and Iran in particular?

And yet today, some journalists have Coltines work and audits have shown that the story as told by Betty Mahmoody could not take place. The paternal family of small Mataub has also provided his testimony and of course denies all the allusions in the book.

The mother of all hoaxes Islamophobic?

I remember reading this book was released, and have been marked ... On one hand I was very young and very naive and I tend to believe what I read in books, especially if I had borrowed from the library I could not imagine at the time that the books listed in the library can be directed ... I was really naive not true, since it is clear that libraries are just the place of the single thought!

Still I could not help but be embarrassed in the armholes when I read this book, given the number of passage clearly racist ... What I remember of the book today: the Iranians are dirty types, without any physical hygiene and food, they are violent, unjust and wicked ...

Later I read the book Midnight Express and I stayed on the same impressions: the Turks are dirty people, with no hygiene, they are violent, unjust and wicked.

Normal: is the purpose of such books to impregnate the collective subconscious with these ideas of hatred towards those people whom we know nothing here ...

Especially as the author of "Not Without My Daughter" and "Midnight Express" is in fact one and the same person and he has therefore taken the same string: William Hoffer.

The aim is precisely to imbue people with the idea that these people these Muslims are absolute beasts ...

This idea will be hammered in the literature, will receive heavy promotion from the press and media, which will systematically ignore their conduct and the necessary audit work, and which are therefore part of the brainwashing machine Islamophobic, then these books will be adapted to film and broadcast and rebroadcast on television ...

After some years of this regime, we can indiscriminately designate Iran as a country or obscurantist women are stuck at home, where they have no rights, and where the mullahs have the right to life and death on them ...

This is exactly the opposite of reality: Iran is becoming a country that is feminized, and whose institutions are destined to increasingly feminized. 60% of university students are women, which will necessarily affect social ... Only

Iranian feminism that is inventing itself in Iran, has absolutely nothing to do with Western feminism strictly ideologically framed, and served often causes the less noble, including participating in the Islamophobic hysteria room, see being in the forefront of this hysteria.

Indeed, feminist hypocrite "Neither whores nor submissive", or the systematic support of many feminist lies in the most notorious Islamophobes, signs the ideological affiliation of these organizations.

Simply follow to achieve the actions and work of Caroline Fourest example.

What motivates this post?

Reading this article from the Palestine Chronicle ... Revealing the hoax of two major recent books of Islamophobia.

books that try to pass a Muslim man for a barbarian that reduces women to less than nothing who does not hesitate to murder his wife or daughter for dark tales of honor, see burn her alive.

I remember a few years ago when I went to Asda, lying between two books by Caroline Fourest, you could find books touting the title as "Burned Alive."

Vaccinated against these lies for many years, I passed my way.

But obviously these books were selling well ...

Today I have the confirmation that these books were hoaxes. Read this article in English, feel free to translate it, I find it edifying.

Behind the mask: the hatred and lies

So apparently this story is totally invented Souad, and as nobody has ever seen without his mask and that is saying she is hiding and has remade his life we will never know what face is real author of this scam that has passed like hotcakes. Moreover, it does not allow the Arab press to interview, and claims not to remember the language, probably because of the trauma eh.

Another revelation of this article of the Palestine Chronicle: Norma Khouri, author of "Forbidden Love" and "For the honor of Dalia" other global bestsellers Islamophobic, invented all the stories that made her a rich woman. With of course the complicity of his publishers and the media have praised, let alone feminist who defended him, without ever checking, as in all similar cases.

Norma Bagain Toliopoulos, called "Khouri", specializing in literature Islamophobic.

It is perhaps not even Muslim, she was born Norma Bagain and Toliopoulos to married name. In Australia it is compared to another highly publicized liar: Helen Darville, better known under the name Helen Demidenko. She had published false memories with the mistaken Ukrainian family supposedly Nazi and anti-Semite who had been part of the Einsatzgruppen murdered Jews and who have kept the concentration camps ... These rants were completely in line with stereotypes about eastern European horribly anti-Semitic and genocidal ... She had obviously won the equivalent of the Prix Goncourt in Next Expand Collapse Search ...

Helen Darville, called "Demidenko" in Ukrainian traditional clothes that she has not a drop of blood Ukrainian ...

Finally was what? Miscellaneous facts atrocious but the magic of literary manipulation, media and film transformed into cultural traits shared by an entire society, a civilization ...

imagine things upside down ... An unbalanced

kills his wife and kids out of desperation following the announcement of a divorce there are many cases like this every year in France ... Imagine that Arab media make it a cultural trait French: French are practicing honor killing in the extreme and kill their whole family, for a simple divorce. It is a regular and recurring in French culture ... Can be found undeniable evidence in this direction. Another cliche

easily mountable pin: the French are all pedophiles (sorry about this, the reputation of French is already done, I had the opportunity to realize it by traveling in some countries Third World who were facing at home in cases of pedophilia involving the French, often also the humanitarian care of children in poverty ... I have already spoken on this blog).

The other day in the subway I heard about the yuppie American and their arrogance, they who take the French for rednecks who have not changed since 1945 ... The executives in question were shocked by how high they were taken by their American colleagues (that I understood their box had been bought by Americans and they happened to many meeting with their staffs in the U.S. ). Arrogance, complacency, a feeling of superiority ... Through much of the French blame the Americans, but they are not shy when they go to practice in former colonies ... So gentlemen if you find intolerable arrogance America against the French, imagine what people may think of the French Moroccan or Tunisian you invade the beaches every summer ...

You see how easy it is to give a name ...

In conclusion we can say what? Tell anything about the Holocaust that goes in the direction of the doctrinaire and allow to restart the machine and make them cry guilty, tell anything about Arabs or Islam that goes in the direction of the impersonate dirty barbarians, without moral values and murderous towards women, and you are sure to be publicized, promoted by what the media are watchdogs of the doctrinaire, you will do money, and probably movies.

What is appalling cons is to see if the books or films antisemitic even if only 10% of what these books are Islamophobes trying to get published in France, all media would sound the motion for battle to check and recheck all the senses the slightest flaw in the story ... And if it turns

ultimately the story was true (he would publish such an account of some atrocities committed by Israeli soldiers since 48), he would receive no response, and would still even fought (just to see with what tenacity the Zionists are trying to pass the death of Mohammed Al Durah small for a hoax, while primary is dead, and secondly, there are thousands of children have been killed by T aha $ £).

Try to finance a film about Naqbah, or distribute it, you tell me the news.

Standing Fan Serviette Folding Instructions

Dieudonné: Fear of Fans
sent narutiba

Invitation Letter For Festival

Let all racist cops in jail! Ghozlan Powa! Carla Bruni

What nonsense!

I have just learned that the 3 cops who held anti-Semitic remarks in a bar the other night, have been put in custody ...

If all the cops who make racist should be put in custody, we may have more cops behind bars before that ...

Ghozlan is decidedly very strong, is not to say he kicked out a telecom operator on a prima facie anti-Semitic, and sometimes even busted his colleagues.

can see who is the head! I propose to appoint as minister Ghozlan from within.

me what shocks me about this story is that cops are rarely convicted or about negrophobia Arabophobia, whereas there by cons, the whole machine was quick to react, and what up at the highest peak!

What a great demo (yet) of double standards!

The worst is that most cops attacked blacks in this bar ...

They could have done as usual the idiots! Insult blacks or Arabs, abuse their status to intimidate or humiliate a boucaque ...

But they have slipped: they passed the limit intolerable, anti-Semitic insults.

For that they will be put in jail.

And to make it happen again, as we indicated in the media, and the interior minister expressed above.

To the cops are well aware of the limit if he would have forgotten to let go on blacks or other Arab and Gypsy gooks OK, but not key to the unspeakable.

Make no mistake not: it is great that these cops should be punished for anti-Semitic ...

But what is needed is that they are also prosecuted for negrophobia because the basis that blacks are they humiliated.

And it would also have all the cops making racist remarks are punished as severely as those, ie with the involvement of the minister.

This is clearly not the case, yet in some quarters, most uninhibited racism is experienced almost daily by a population comes to cowboys, and who actually do the cleaning from the mafia and traffickers important prey for small fish (small offenders, young wankers uncivil but not necessarily very bad) to see the population perfectly honest but guilty of misdemeanor dirty mouth ( the beauty is in the eye of the beholder).

While dealing with this situation?

Enter negrophobia crimes and Arabophobia, as well as Islamophobia or gensduvoyageophobie, plus a gaggle of other crimes in the law.

And establish offices vigileance cons Negrophobia, Arabophobia, Islamophobia and gensduvoyageophobie that could have as many plays as did the office Ghozlan.

You can always brush ... And even though life would become intolerable!

So what? Well, simply to fight against all forms of racism, leaving such anti-Semitism of his judicial ghetto, and in doing so incorporate other racisms, under the same legal regime and being absolutely vigilant against all forms of racism, especially when it comes Police, who is supposed to protect citizens.

Unless it is there to protect and mater ... In which case we would have confirmation that the French Revolution was really a coup by changing the power to amend or hands but how to govern, nor the instruments of power ... It seems that in looking more closely, it is the conclusion we reach there ...

So it's almost 220 years that gargling with notions of equality, liberty and fraternity are all that are a gotcha ...

Or as in Animal Farm, read The added words "especially for pigs."

PS: I'm obviously not accusing all the cops ... but more than 20 years of commuter, I had time to realize that the bad apples were not uncommon ... I have often seen in controls facies allusions degenerate into racist ... This was not done systematically all officials, I have even been embarrassed and become detached, but it exists, and it seems that it has worsened in recent years. Normal given the climate ...

And they accuse Le Pen not have soured the climate ... In my day, racist cops abusing their power was referring rather to Pasqua and Sarkozy to taunt their victims ...

Le Pen has always been an excuse to carry on his shoulders alone the accusations of racism by passing clearance at the left and right.

Some sociologists have talked about the Lepenization minds a few years ago: I rather think that it is the mask of the media left and right who fell progressively to finally express what this whole clique of privileged people think. At one point they perceived it would be politically advantageous to drop the mask, Seeing the big score of Le Pen ...

And believe me, they do not necessarily think most French people from the bottom ... Only there, it would be suicidal politically to recognize ...

How Can I Cleanse My Stomach

, racism, democracy and system of the Truman Show shit

To make you happy: the wallpaper Carla Bru ... Sarkozy, young!

Carla Bruni naturalized in 5 sec



Go, a few people for a change! Although the policy is not far.


I just heard on a blog, have announced that Claude Gueant naturalization Express Carla Bruni, against all rules and laws of the Republic.


Our elected monarch gave us a beautiful demonstration of the fact of the prince.


In principle, a Franco-foreigner must prove several years (4-5) of common life and residence in the country for abroad (e) could be grant French nationality, whose allocation is also not automatic.


Before the law does not harden, the duration of cohabitation was 2 years, but the fight against bogus marriages.


This law clearly aimed blacks, because every black (e) who marries a (e) French (e) is necessarily suspected of contracting a marriage ... When I say black is at large, I mean the poor third world in general.


It goes without saying that a black African son of minister or good family FranCafrican have no desire to see grant French nationality (again it should be understood broadly and black Françafrique broad sense: all neo-colonial countries, ie almost all former colonies).


Well, once again, we demonstrate that the discourse on the birthright, the right soil, the France you love it or leave it, the fight against immigration and so on. is a vast hypocrisy.


votes are gained on average franchouillard and reactionary ...


makes me more than anything else the trouble: if the medium is so reactionary franchouillard also means that its average life is shit and it alleviates the yelling is more miserable than cons.



hypocrisy of political rhetoric, including reactionary ...


Basically, this is doubly poor franchouillard screwed by the elites: in swallowing and speech reactionary facade politicians (whether left or right, given that today racism is more uninhibited because of the extreme right, which also means little or not, while yet the media climate has never been racist in France I know), he turned against the poor buggers with whom he has more in common than anything else (the contempt of the elites, the life of poverty, social insecurity ...) and he loses sight of the real culprits. .. Those who puff ortolans tringlent and top models in showing off on the yacht and luxury hotels.


Instead of despising the poor cloistered in the cities, the basic franchouillard should realize that the conditions living in cities is what awaits him as he continues to be led by the nose by corrupt elites.


The situation in France could take as long as there was a real middle class, but it is increasingly precarious, more and more suburban: I see among my colleagues, with the increasing massive fortune real estate, even the executives have fled the central cities to settle in the suburbs more and more distant ... A good crash should also not delay for any damn flat and put homeowners in trouble ... New avalanche of bullshit ahead for the coast ... Sarkozy's popularity



Asked Sarkozy is racist? What can we respond?



Sarkozy is not racist ... Or if not as one might think ...


Sarkozy is not racist, or he is racist as are the aristocrats and the bourgeois class is racist. Do not forget he has his father's aristocratic origins and bourgeois by his mother ... Bourgeois and aristocrats from all countries are not racist among them: a son of French billionaire marry a girl easier Muslim billionaire, a poor French shepherdess. Origin and religion are secondary in these cases.

Basically if Sarkozy is a racist, his racism certainly extends to the big red-faced redneck who voted for him ... But stops when the bank account allows you to escape the blackness or bougnoulitude ...


Racism is a bullshit invented to divide the poor slobs them, make them fight, hate, fight against each other, in short to waste time and energy and leave the field open to those who decide.



I did not vote in 2007, the scam was too big ... The campaign had focused on anything but Sarkozy, Sego to win by reaction ...


When we see that the government took over the Sarko PS ministers would have probably named Sego, we think we lost anything.


Instead, I prefer a cash Sarko, who is there and that clearly shows the contempt he has for the common people, that people realize that a good shot.



Sego Sarko same Emptiness ... Uselessness and lure of democracy ...



With Sego we would have had a more soft than Sarko, but also more insidious. At least he shows off ... If it can help open your eyes ...


Anyway policy is decided behind our backs, and policies are only belts. Business lobbies run all the evidence, the democratic voice of the NO in the referendum on the EU constitution is violated with the complicity of the right and the left (which has not voted against the adoption of the parliamentary treaty).


So what the policy is a decoy? Marketing? Yes ...


democracy, a scam? Yes ... You feel you count in the decisions that are taken you?



uselessness of political commitment


"But nothing prevents you to get involved in politics blah blah "... Asshole goes, You can certainly try to get involved in a partner or a party, we'll send you paste posters and meetings that are useless if it is the illusion that you participate in local politics for most rabid ... we will send throwing stones, just to play in the revolution and that you can unwind yourself ... Once


you want to get involved seriously in politics that is trying to influence the debate, see accapparer post-decision, if you do not sleep to our market you are gun ... we Dieudonné has proved that a black said what he thought (and think what a lot of blacks, that the memory of suffering Afro is violated, and that the competition of victimhood that those who complain that the substance, although competition is a big word, we should talk about monopoly) was good for the stake ...


It would be 200 years ago, Dieudonné had been captured, he would have stuffed his ass with gunpowder, and it would have exploded in the public square in front of other slaves to teach them to rebel .. . Yes, it seems that such punishment was practiced ...


Today gunpowder was replaced by media defamation and professional ruin, but in principle it changes nothing, a black freedom zouquer, but should not he dares to open his mouth ...


So all genuine political commitment is impossible: either you're completely taken over and neutralized completely in vain actions, or if you are spotted as intransigent you are pushed to the margin, and if you are considered as potential leader, so beware you!


The only way: to understand what is expected of the negro or nigger today and play the game


Must hurry, with competition on the visibility of blacks and Arabs in the media, there are places to take. Apparently there is also a lot of guys ready to fight and sell fathers and mothers to get there, having their mouths on TV or on a list, and wages that are consistent with ...


And the worst is that I imagine you know: the types who started from scratch after several years of policy can make their careers in brackets to sell, or rather sell their address book, as a consultant in private lobbyist understand, with wages as a Minister in the 12 000 euros per month.


Anyway, I am totally disgusted with politics and I am convinced that all political speeches are playing on the flank the mood of the moment, mood spread on the media ...


10 years ago when winning the World Cup, we were all Black Blanc Beur ...


Today blacks and Beurs are all anti-Semitic ...


In 2 cases is that the press gives the ...



Uselessness humanitarian engagement


"Yeah, but poor apple, you have to be active in humanitarian associations so if you want to be helpful and change things." Bis asshole!


First, humanitarian organizations will not change the system of injustice and oppression who fucks the shit not only here but also in Africa and the Third World in general.


This system supports the injustices ... Let me explain by giving a clear conscience in this country neo-colonization, he keeps his eyes closed on the real issues.


occuppe Furthermore it advocates the more ready to engage, detracting from the real fight needs to happen here in the rich countries, not in Africa.


Just look at that third world countries that are doing best, like China and India are also those who refused external interference, including that of humanitarian. Then


often behind the better-known, hide barbouzards that make the interference under the guise of humanitarian espionage, weapons delivery, support for armed factions and militias ... All assos are not like that, but unfortunately we can not say it's wrong, when Kouchner himself has recognized.


And finally, imagine that I know something about the middle of the humanitarian need to say what is, I know lots of people who do that as we take a safari in Africa ...


They start delivering water pumps, or give French lessons, and already have big pictures in their heads ... They believe their work is useless, parcequ'avec corruption and tribalism that exists in Africa, the pump will be in the chief's hut as a trophy, and eventually rusted and useless ...


For the most honest of these motivations were clear: there are plenty of pretty nice and cool chicks who go do humanitarian work, is the opportunity to make friends with a nurse or language teacher ...


And I'm not talking about pedophilia cases that have involved humanitarian of the entourage of the innénarrable Bernard Kouchner ...


Anyway, ultimately, the final word on all this: the vanity ... All this is useless!



Respect to the doctor and the nurse who saves the life of a small child who is likely anyway to get sniper or crushed by a tank after a few years ...


But rather than treat symptoms, it is the cause of the disease must be tackled ...


And that's the whole system of international relations need to rethink and flat, identifying why the system generates so many horrors and injustices, and how to avoid ...



The problem is the system, political activist for the humane and engaging part of the system ... If we want things to change, we must go to war against the system!


Haaa I dream almost the day we will be ruled by machines, without emotion, without passion, without desire for power and domination, not knowing the love of money and all that follows. ..


Until our political systems are based on it is what will prevail ...


I do not believe in representative democracy, as giving a power an elected representative is to allow it to be corruptible.


Politicians come and go, the lobbies remain.


worse, today they are the lobbies that nominate candidates, so the elected ...


The basis of all this shit: the power of money.



Imagine that Dieudonné is rich as Croesus overnight: it buys TF1, finances films on slavery, finance the next presidential candidate, and of course in return gets a new deal in relations FranCafrican, obtains days of commemorations etc..


Problem: wealth fall from the sky. To become rich, become part of the club, he must necessarily pass through phases of capital accumulation that take generations and over time you change ... The great grand son of Dieudonne is a billionaire if he is a good chance it has nothing to fuck in Africa and that he be put entirely complicit with the powers of mafia money. Moreover

want proof: Just look at the Muslim billionaires? What are they doing to the Muslims who call for help? Bugger all: they are studying at Harvard, and spend their money in casinos luxury to spend their Holiday Packages Saint Tropez, and frequent whores who pass earn the same as the average salary of French ... They are fully recovered by the system ... And it will hardly took 2 generations to rot as they leave ...


Those who do not work in these schemes are either killed or are accused of terrorism and is seen stuck on the bottom of the attacks without any evidence (so far nothing serious has to prove that bin Laden is guilty 911, besides, it is likely there to defend himself).


So the problem is actually much money that corrupts all ...


Who controls the money? Which the product? The prints? Puts it in circulation?


In a democracy it is expected that the main power is in the hands of popular representation: it is false, ECB in Europe and America EDF are private banks that are accountable to no state .


other words, they are private bankers, not politicians, who s'occuppent of money ...


So first thing we need to reclaim the money.


Then, we must study all the mechanisms by which the money can ... All religions forbid lending at interest ... Why?


Large old they had smelt the scrambles?


The money goes to live, but from a critical mass it becomes a weapon! Individual wealth, capital accumulation beyond certain limits, rules of inheritance should be redesigned ....


Money in public life and democratic should also be considered ...


The right to information should be free and fair part of human rights, and for that we must establish a set of rules to prevent the media from being accapparrés by money ...


We fought for centuries to free itself of state censorship, censorship to get back on the money!


the same way that merely increasing the possession of money, you should also limit down, and establish a minimum income of humanity ...


Every human being should be able to have the minimum for living, eating, dressing, hot, heal, learn (schools, media).


How many geniuses die every day before reaching the age of 5?


To prevent abuses around money, we should make all accounts public, more secrets ...


Everyone can tell at a click of the mouse that everyone has, money and valuable goods (cars, houses, yachts ...).


could lengthen the list of proposed studies for a while like that ...


Besides, we should first clear all the debts, and rethink the way we live, so that everyone can live with dignity.


It is obvious that if we want that everyone can live decently, we can not continue to pollute like that in Europe, and we can not accept that other countries will follow suit.


Only it is hypocritical to ban China and India to drive a jalopy if we do not change too.


must leave everything flat and redefine all ...

Reorient agriculture for subsistence and for profit or speculation ...


short, is a global new deal is needed by identifying all the power centers, starting with the one and only real center of power, that of money.


This may seem a little naive, I have no solutions, I just found problems ...


If some want to contribute positively, we can start think together ...

Cismigiu disgusted?

Not realistic ... I just need to take to demonstrate that the old schemes of my family went through in Romania: royalist, communist, free market democracy ...

The difference between these 3 systems?

Slim ... Very thin ...

At the time of King, you shut your mouth and you not criticizing the king or you will land in jail. For the rest, public affairs, the economy was the case of the affluent.

Basically, if the types of messing up too much, the economy was relatively well and you lived not too bad ... In a crisis it is you who clutched the belt until it passes ...

To spend royalism to communism was not asked his opinion to the people, simple coup.

course, immediately after the Communist coup, was not talk of a coup, but democratic and popular revolution against the tyrannical regime of before ...

During communism ditto: if you opened your mouth against the party, you were sent to jail and you will be stuck in political trials in the ass. The ruling classes if they managed not too bad economy, people had nothing to say they had to eat on the table, could go on holiday to the sea, watching TV ... When the crisis set in and he had to tighten their belts, it's still the people who morflé ...

To transition from communism to market democracy, there was not yet sought the views of people: the coup.

Well, we still live in this new system there, so it is no exaggeration to say that it is a coup. It is a popular and democratic revolution against the tyrannical regime before.

Again, what really matters to people is the alternation of periods of economic crises and relative calm ...

But in life every day nothing has changed ...

Prisons are the same since the days of King under the communists and today. You do not change a prison system that wins ... The inner secret police, which existed in the time of the king, has continued to improve. Today it is more discreet than in the days of communism when the goal was to scare people to force them to censor themselves and go straight. She returned to its original objectives, spy, and has adopted modern means.

For self-censorship, no need to allow the threat of the secret police: just to let the associations to paste trial ass citizens who back too, and let the power of money do the rest.

Anyway, everyone was converted successively royalism to communism to democracy and market ...

Why I take this example? Because this is more or less all countries experienced as political developments ... Plans call as you like, royalty, empire, the first republic, third republic, second empire, the mullahs' regime, the Shah regime, tsarist, Soviet, Caliphate, People's Republic ...

Diets pass, but people's lives do not change. They do not make decisions for their lives. Everything is packaged outside their reach.

They undergo ... If there is Thune then fine, if the crisis when you suffered, if it's war you are trying to survive ...

It feels may not be relevant in France Because it makes a bunch of years that there was no real crisis, and even real wars (you can not compare the Russian front and the occupation of France virtually without a fight), but in lots of countries around the world, people morflent morflait worse than at the time of the Great Depression ...

Basically all that to say that basically, all plans are alike: it's autocracy that prevails, whether aristocratic, bourgeois, religious or political.

Show me a true democracy?

And do not tell me "at least you vote here." Primo in dictatorships as they vote, then I can vote more finito!

The big difference between here and dictatorships is that at least here we are smarter and are made more credible genre scores of 50/50 to close pouillièmes that make the difference ... Instead of 99.97% (note the 0.3% granted) banana republic ...

Nomarks Cream Is Work Well Or Not

Meddeb vs. Ramadan in Taddéi


Article response that of natives of the Republic (congratulations, continue as you do)!

No wonder that "intellectual" who cachetonne at France Culture is not a mediocre sold?

France Culture radio that only the uneducated continue to listen. Indeed, when you have two fingers of culture, errors, approximations and lies that are carried by the radio listener can not alienate any one rogue on the quality of what he hears. Especially when the subjects pertaining to Islam, Israel, or roughly everything that relates to this smoky clash of civilizations.

Ramadan has indeed been robust as he knows how, acquired through rigorous trials certainly ruthless he is always victim: we saw that the media never let go the slightest approximation to language in Ramadan ... Taddéi glad he was allowed to explain the famous "moratorium" that has cost so much.

However, Ramadan could have been much more severe in his arguments.

There are several facts that have unacceptable level of challenges.

First, the rhetoric about Islam Meddeb Sick, is neither more nor less than the conversion of old cliches Islamophobic and racist colonial period, when designated the Ottoman Caliphate as the "sick man of Europe".

Secondo, the broadcast with the onboard camera hidden in mosques: this story is signed Mohammed Sifaoui.

Sifaoui coming again in recent days to discredit him by raising the false case Mouzin to make the pub and do harm to Alexandre Lebrun, Chinese personality he has tried to impersonate a leaders of the Asian mafia to France in a story anthology so it stinks of manipulation.

Returning to the debate: he had to make this Ramadan with Meddeb debate, if only to force him to be discovered.

Indeed, for many people Meddeb was a wave character which no one knew exactly what he thought. Today we know: no doubt that his credibility will take a hit. Objective persons who were willing to listen to his shows or buy his books know what to expect now.

His public prosecutor and is now limited to fans of Oriana Falacci or Redeker.

Thirdly, Ramadan should have put more emphasis on the incomprehensibility of speech Meddeb. On what Meddeb truffle you it his speech with references to modern European philosophers to ask the question of Islam? References to Aristotle are more logical in that Aristotle came to the EU via the Arab who had integrated the ancient Greek thought ... For the rest, references to Popper and others ... except to please BHL, I saw not too much related to Islam and its civilization ...

What would a Western intellectual if an Arab intellectual was judged Western civilization by citing references in Eastern philosophers and thinkers? No reports, no historical affiliation. He would laugh in his face and he looks like he is irrelevant.

In fact all the fuss pseudo cultural Meddeb (I say pseudo because Ramadan was fined by pointing its gross historical errors and obvious lack of culture) were for the sole purpose of looking good in the Parisian intelligentsia.

Meddeb reminds me of Philippe Val with bigger hair and a mustache, Philippe Val, which conceals the emptiness of his brain with constant references to philosophers that readers of Charlie Hebdo in general have certainly never read .

Good in the background one can not blame Ramadan to have missed two or three clubs to contradict arguments Meddeb because Meddeb said so much shit at a rate so huge as humanly difficult all face, Ramadan was therefore obliged to sort as he could and he did well. Apparently

also must say that Ramadan did not know him either obviously not very well Meddeb.

Indeed this mixture so as references in his broadcasts, and books, it is difficult to understand what he really thinks.

Yesterday, he gave his true face.

Democrat, opposed to torture and tyranny, for a true reform of Islam and secularism including really, it was Ramadan.

Meddeb passed to it for what it is: a guy always on the side the handle. What courage to lick the back of Arab dictators, and taking the side of atlanto-Zionist intelligentsia in France! In doing so he avoids trouble and his career is assured. What is absolutely the opposite of the situation of Ramadan.

the way, a little dedication to Taddéi, which is probably the best host of talk shows today.

Unlike Yves Calvi systematically guiding the discussion as they see fit, so depending on their ideological reading, Taddéi let his guests speak, do not censor, do not interrupt, is withdrawn, and above is the only one to invite of pariahs in all other media, such as Ramadan, Nabe, Boutheldja, Jacques Verges etc.. and put them in front of real ideological opponents of the type of pedants Finkielkraut constantly invited anywhere without ever having opponents, and generally broke into discussion before the above-mentioned. Congratulations to

Taddei, and good luck because it is certainly getting a lot of pressure to try to stifle freedom of expression. Taddéi walking on eggshells every time he invites a controversial figure like Ramadan and I am sure many would like to see disappear issue.

Symbols Of Volleyball

Sifaoui risk a lawsuit for false accusation in the revival of the case Mouzin

A AFP dispatch has just confirmed: there was never any human remains in the basement of the Royal Wok restaurant.

The only bones found are of animal origin.

The prosecution reserves the right to sue for false accusations ... So it would probably Sifaoui concern in this story, after he tried once again to trap Alexandre Lebrun: one, true to his role as storyteller, had allowed himself to "confidences "untruthful about a dead girl buried under the restaurant.

Sifaoui would have hidden camera filmed, due having completed its report and be sure it is broadcast on TF1 (probably to touch his big check), before alerting the police.

Result: a month of bugging, police mobilized more, searches that do nothing, false hopes revived in vain for the family, all media that get involved (is it Sifaoui who leaked to damage Lebrun or the Asian community?).

If prosecutors do not pursue, I hope it will continue Lebrun.

Anyway though Momo dons behind the mask of virtue: "I did not know what to do, so I alerted the police," this case continues to discredit him. And

will contribute to further increase the anger and resentment against his lack of scruples, ethics, and his taste for trickery. This time it's not the Arabs or Asians that it takes but a little French girl whose disappearance has moved the whole country.

We do not play with these feelings there! I think for Sifaoui a lie too.

Mount And Blade Defeat Race

Estelle Mouzin, Mohamed Sifaoui and Alexandre Lebrun

Incredible new one learns at the moment: the person behind the new track on the disappearance of Estelle Mouzin none other than ... Mohammed Sifaoui ...

And from what can be deduced by reading this passage from an article in JDD:

http://www.lejdd.fr/cmc/societe/20085/estelle-mouzin-l-incroyable-piste_91021.html

In Indeed, this termination is reached through a television journalist. The latter had been in contact with a person involved in the work and wanted to "avenge" the owner of the restaurant. A character "unfavorably known" to police, including fraud. The owner of the establishment, as its employees and workers who participated in the work, should be arrested at Brie-Comte-Robert, but also Lognes in a restaurant. By mid-afternoon, nine people had been placed in custody.

can certainly conclude that the man in custody is Alexandre Lebrun, who has a restaurant Lognes among others.

Now on this blog and on the ogres and tvdieudo.info, let alone dailymotion own blog and Alexandre Lebrun, the questionable methods used by Sifaoui to achieve its "stories", including one on the Asian environment have been widely denounced and dismantled.

This was followed by a media controversy, which may have accelerated the sidelining of Charles Villeneuve of TF1, and have created problems for Sifaoui.

A show at Paul Amar had been scheduled to defend and discredit Sifaoui Lebrun (antenna but not represented by counsel) and a trial should have taken place against Sifaoui who train 52 Asian organizations on their backs, and several Chinese TV channels ...

short, the least we can say is that Alexandre Lebrun was not easily done and was trying to cause harm to Sifaoui.

Alexandre Lebrun seems to have lots of faults, but we have seen in dissecting the story of Sifaoui, that the allegations the latter were totally unproven and totally free. Lebrun can accuse of being a grugeur SCIF, the URSSAF and other, but from there to make a mafia ... Lebrun is certainly a little mythology and likes to tell it, but it's nothing compared to the mythomania and egocentrism Sifaoui.

I also doubt that a child killer, make as much effort as Lebrun to her star on TV ...

The survey will tell us why and how, but frankly, this story stinks horribly ...

This is very similar to being framed by Sifaoui revenge for Alexander. This

Nor is difficult for a guy like Alexander must have a thousand enemies ready to hurt him ... Sifaoui by party.

From there, convergence of reckoning ...

Sifaoui What had perhaps not anticipated was the magnitude that would take the information in the media before the court to pronounce ... Unless it is deliberately spread the rumor among his colleagues, unaware that his name would be revealed ...

Anyway, if this case proves to be a damp squib, I know a journalist whose credibility is already well under way, and that can take a one-way Algiers ... Because it will definitely be blown professionally in France.

cons If it turns out that it is the corpse of a child .... Justice should be extremely vigilant on this matter, and explore all avenues, including that of stunt to hurt Lebrun. Lebrun indeed presents a profile of ideal culprit after the smear campaign orchestrated against him by Lebrun ... If

Sifaoui attempted to exploit the memory of Estelle Mouzin Lebrun to harm, it would be extremely serious ...

It would be a terrible insult to the memory of this small, and the pain of parents ...

EDIT: we learn from the new obstacles that it Lebrun himself would have bragged in front of hidden camera Sifaoui this case: he is blackmailing the boss of Royal Wok to remain silent ...
We'll see what gives the investigation afterwards ... But in an interview on 20 minutes Sifaoui refuses to give source of information when it is simply Lebrun and he has filmed. Why does he pretend to protect a source?

EDIT2: this case is moving very fast! Here is an excerpt from an AFP dispatch:

"The remains of bones that were found are those of animals: the information that we have had are probably wrong track, "said the police source, adding that searches were continuing for final checks.
" The people who gave this information were taken at their own game: they are fantasists, "the source said. "There are those who have seen the bones that have told others who have distorted reality," he said this source. Of the ten people arrested, including contractors, employees and the restaurant manager, six were released Friday morning, "because there is nothing to reproach them," the source said.

This confirms well what I thought. Question of who speaks when the person uses the term storyteller caught in his own trap? Lebrun? Sure, but a bullshit told at the counter of this kind has not taken such gigantic proportions ... The term therefore applies storyteller both Sifaoui, and even more in his case because he took the responsibility to alert the police, six months after this story (at the time of the release of its report).

Question: Why so late? Maybe because he knew that this track was not credible and that Lebrun was a braggart who told anything, and therefore he preferred quietly continue his story, rather than take the risk of alerting the police and get wrong with his actor? This confirms the thesis that Sifaoui who plays the innocent knew very well the trickery which he was trying to deliver ...

Question 2: Why denounce the end? Is this a reckoning cons Lebrun following the controversy after the publication of the subject?

Question 3: what will stop Sifaoui, a journalist clearly dishonest and twisted mentality? When will the TV stations will stop working with him? After all, it's good now, NS is elected, the trouble to add ladles on racist on TV. On the contrary, if NS wants to avoid the machine eludes him the benefit of the extreme right, he'd better put the soft pedal ...

Coffee Stomach Ache Acid

which Prof. slap a little black teacher who slaps a policeman's son ... Abuse of power all azimuths and double standards

Héhééé, here is a small Ultrafast who challenged me ... Read it in full!

MAUBEUGE (AFP) - A teacher who admitted slapping a classroom
Grade 6 student who had insulted him, Monday Berlaimont (North), near Maubeuge, has been placed for 24
hours in police custody.

He will be tried late March
for "aggravated violence against minors", said on Wednesday
judicial source.
Monday morning, the technology teacher at the college
Gilles de Chin, aged 49, had pushed the floor of the student affairs
11 years old after asking to store a table in disarray at the back of
class, "he told an AFP correspondent. But the pupil

have asked for an explanation and the teacher would have pushed against the door bottom
. The child, looking into his eyes, would have blown "asshole" to
address the teacher who slapped him at that time.
By late morning, the father of the minor
, himself a policeman in uniform came to college to
seek clarification from the professor before filing a complaint. Later,
police came for the teacher in him and placed him in custody for 24 hours
.
"In 30 years of career, I had never talked like that.
My heart missed a beat, and I slapped him," said the professor admits
an "authoritarian temperament "and being" a bit maniacal ". "We do not accept
a teacher slapped a child whatever the circumstances
, "said the rector.
The teacher has been suspended until
his trial for" aggravated violence "March 27 court
Correctional Avesnes-sur-Helpe.

We're all so used for over 5 years of continuous campaign of the candidate Sarkozy, has heard the news stand behind the teachers against the little savages "color", which of course I expected to read this brief that the AFP, necessarily objective (it is paid for that), take the teacher's defense against the cheeky little shit, always black and Arab, who assaulted and crossed the line.

In fact as and when we read, is quite the opposite of what the media have watered during the last 5 years is going ...

The teacher, instead of being praised for his authoritarianism and his fist against the savages "color", finds himself in custody.

The reason is simple: it is not a little savage "of color" who attacked, but the son of a policeman (the story does not tell us whether the policeman is "color" but I guess not, reasoning statistically on the number of policemen "of color "on the one hand, and the chances that such a case takes such proportions if it had been a small black slapped, he was the son of Constable).

This paper demonstrates the double standard almost gleefully unaware of the media, and society of double standards in which one sinks.

First, if this kid was not the son of policeman, the teacher would have never been in police custody 24 hours for a simple slap. I do not defend the "violence" of teachers, but sometimes there are slapping that are lost, even if it is not common, it happens that teachers slap students, and they do not end up in custody so far. I bet that this teacher is customary due, except that there it has chosen its target badly.

This incident demonstrates that the police and other police officers, lawyers and judges, who are part of the machinery of the police and judiciary, have privileged access to this unit when it comes to defending their own affairs . In this area, shoemakers are not the worst shod, quite the contrary.

Golden Republic, a police officer, policeman or magistrate who takes hold of Justice to settle a case should return to being a private citizen and does not benefit either the zeal or the complacency of his colleagues.

This is clearly not the case: it can be concluded that in principle, the difference between a banana republic is thin. The degree of complacency and corruption is certainly not the same, but in principle, from the moment a politician or a policeman can blow up the PV of a friend, we are already in a form of unfair favoritism violates republican principles, even when justice can be used on a preferred by those who are part of the system.

In fact, it You just recognize that we live in a caste system, where some have more rights than others.

What difference in the background with a communist society in which aparatchiks enjoyed hobbies rights and privileges?

On any principles, then it's a matter of degree.

But if the republican principles are violated, regardless of the degree, there is the soil needed to make a difference to a society increasingly unfair. That's what happens with a font that is becoming increasingly repressive and increased defense of the citizen to the suspicion of all citizens ... A bit again, as a former political police of former East European countries, where the police were there to monitor the people to protect them.

I exaggerate? J'affabule? No, it's just a matter of degree. The shift in the last 15 years has done so naturally, with the complicity of the media hysteria and racist and Islamophobic negrophobia making suspicious social strata of the population most vulnerable.

As anticipated from the beginning, the hardening of relations police against certain categories of the French population is now expanding to the rest of the population.

is classic! The public did not react when the police became increasingly repressive in the neighborhoods, when community policing was supprimmée and instead we put the cowboys who assume that all residents of neighborhoods are suspect, the little old lady in the headscarf schoolboy with his satchel.

The relationship between the police and these neighborhoods have escalated until these become even more ghetto ghettos. When we checked 3 times per day by the same officers, who know you by heart, knowing that you are speaking, what amounts to harassment, it is enough to feel excluded from society. Why not install checkpoints in the neighborhoods? I guess that's the meaning of the proposals made by experts in NS Israeli police who came to the counselor during the 2005 riots.

Until this hardening policeman was confined to quarters, the population made complacent by hypnosis and television media has absolutely no reaction. Instead, she applauded! It was time to restore order in these lawless areas.

The problem (predictably) is that these flawed relations are spread increasingly to the rest of the population, even white and Christian.

must never forget that all measures taken against the most unjust to the weaker sections of the population, have always served in all plans to prepare public opinion for the extension of these measures remains of the population!

This is particularly true of UAV currently used on an exceptional basis by the Police to monitor certain events (Parade July 14) under the guise of fighting against terrorism, the use of UAVs is being extended to the districts, and will soon be extended to events. Ideal for taking photos of protesters without detection! Note that the drones are used in Israel to monitor the Palestinian territories, hence suggesting that their use in France was inspired by the Israeli police advisers received by NS in 2005-2006 ...

Anyway, regarding the police abuse of authority, they extend more and more out of neighborhoods.

Today it is the leftists standing up for undocumented are treated the same way that the "natives" of neighborhoods. Brutality, harassment, lawsuits galore (contempt agent for simply questioning a police officer, rebellion for simply asked why, if nothing else, all in immediate appearance, so speedy justice, see your sites miscellaneous Preferred for details).

Tomorrow who's next? Everything is in place for society to make society more police: it waiting for a September 11 French, and the establishment of a patriot act version camembert ...

But I digress: back to the history teacher.

So this teacher, who was defended by the press if he had slapped a small black or a cheeky little Arabic, will take 24 hours in police custody for slapping a policeman's son. And the article clearly condemns this teacher, and presents the facts in order to justify the reaction of the kid: Fury of the teacher made the kid throws the business down and stick it to the door ... Normal for the kid sucker treats his teacher because it as presented.

In fact, this version is certainly not the media version of prof. But we will not know anything.

I guess if it was a small black slapped, or a little Arabic, things would certainly have been presented differently.

Instead of generating a debate on violence by teachers against students, it is certainly the opposite would have happened: it would have generated a debate on the violence of students vis-à-vis teachers, and would have raised the question of authority Teacher's gender should it restore corporal punishment? ". It's always like that the rest What was presented in such cases the last 5-6 years.

In conclusion, when you're a small white policeman's son, there are extenuating circumstances for treating a teacher asshole, and slapped the teacher is a sign of intolerable violence that deserves a teacher 24 hours in police custody and interest of the national press.

When you're a small black or Arab son of a poor without relations, it is always wrong, and the slap of any teacher is merely the symbol of authority the former should restore these young cons who violate the most sacred shrine of the school ...

Abuse of power, double standards forever ...

PS: I am personally to a school where they study, implying that gives teachers the means to implement their authority, without going to the corporal punishment of course, since there will always be sadistic teachers to abuse their power. It should be possible for example effectively handle disruptive students. Formerly the school was deemed authoritative leave on the side maladjusted students, crabs and everything else. Today, in some neighborhoods, it suffers badly from reverse: leaving some students heckle inappropriate courses without adequate response to proposing is the class that is injured, including students anxious to move forward. We need to find responses to some cases of disruptive students (and often family and social suffering for what I saw, and enjoy themselves at school), with appropriate care of the problem. It is true that the school is not the place of social or psychological help, because in fact, quite the opposite: all the problems of children is discharged to the school. If the state fails to take into account the social and psychological dimension of school just to make a "temple of knowledge", they make a mistake completely and certainly will solve the problem of PTA. But they really want to fix it? Inevitably the social and family problems spill over the child, so the school where he spends most of his day. Now the teachers are absolutely not prepared for that. And it must be said, in many PTA Teacher do not care about their students, even conditioning them to prepare failure. I lived as a student first, then attending teachers. Many teachers in the PTA are young graduates from Province who are totally disgusted with the obligation upon them to come and teach away from home in the worst suburbs. They live poorly, and this will affect their teaching. Many have huge misconceptions about the children they must support, bias in the media for years. This is also the same problem with the police: why always send the contact population of suburban youth provincial inexperienced, unmotivated, and who do not understand these neighborhoods? I spoke at some schools to prevent students guidance disastrous "typed" into undervalued sectors like apprenticeships in college. In one case, the words "next grade" had been erased with white correction on the ballot to redirect the student to a fourth technology, so that the student had good grades. It was in this case to fill a new class of fourth techno which opened at the time in college. Who do you think they have directed force there? Blacks and Arabs ... At the meeting with teachers to address the problem, there were almost as parents "white" to come to complain about a policy to be arbitrary ... And a few Arab and black ... All have been successful on appeal. For those with whom I kept in touch, most had their tray and continued in college. In one case, a young highly motivated even managed to reinstate the high road and end up in a large school, despite a passage through the channels "technological". All this indicates to me a colonial administration of education in some districts: to fill the new 4th grade technology, it automatically mute and without asking the small black and Arab, including when the class council had decided on their next grade, and no one hesitates to use it for the blanco! The worst is the number of parents completely conditioned to feel inferior intellectually and actually accepts without questions asked trial of professors ... How surprising to many flagrant injustice, that little kid treated like a nobody by his teachers, had a conflicting relationship with the teachers when it became the parent of a student?

note, I do not blame all the teachers, but I have enough known as this to know that this is a real problem. Golden State must decide when the policy in PTA never takes into account the teacher factor, including prejudice and lack of motivation that affect many young teachers who see their assignment as punishment. Should not we instead put the most motivated teachers in the PTA? If necessary should not have to motivate teachers by offering higher pay, and judging them in part the result?

I do not obviously share the vision of a fanatical Finkielkraut about the school, for what I could tell, and I have a sacred experience having attended school trash can top-level schools, the school is primarily a breeding ground of caste in French, and impregnating the mold small citizens of future prejudice and conditioned reflexes will be expected of him as an adult. This is not to make the citizen too smart, just enough for him to vote, it works, consumes, pay taxes and close his mouth.

For me at school is vital to distinguish between the harmful and positive, because there are two, and it also depends on a lot of teachers we have and their political opinions, or just their principles and ideals of life.

I'm not saying do not learn what I call "the pest". Instead, we must learn and repeat like a parrot, while being no fool and knowing yourself overwhelmed by the prejudices that we are taught. This is especially true for geo-history programs remain particularly impregnated with prejudice "the Ferry", ie colonial prejudices, and highlighted everything that is the Republic, taking care to erase all that is really annoying (negative side of colonialism: genocide, slavery, not a word in programs).

But if we want his tank and spend his qualifications, it is a necessary evil to learn that the vision of the history of national education.

Ditto for the rest.

In the limit when you're a kid, we must first learn something, something he was biased. What matters then is to revisit any what we take for granted.

revisited I personally almost all the geographical history program, and my vision of the sacred "French Revolution" for example, has completely changed.

It is presented in the program as an act of liberation of the people vis-à-vis the tyranny that is exactly how the Romanian Revolution of 1989 is presented in school curricula Romania, or the Orange Revolution in Ukraine or the Rose Revolution in Georgia, while in each case there is a fraud and a coup to get the political power of the hands of a caste to another. Regarding the French Revolution, the coup was to deprive the aristocracy of French traditional power politics, power inherited from feudalism, ie the operation and defense of the earth, the principal vector wealth during the Middle Ages.

But it is only from the discovery of America, a new class of super-rich ultra-bourgeois began to emerge, including families who made their fortune in the industry sugar Santo Domingo. You should know that at the time of Louis XIV, the sugar industry is by far the largest source of revenue of France, to an extent that it is hard to imagine, and sugar are the consequences of extremely powerful people . Many are the foundation of modern capitalism, are part of the financial system and have been the drivers of the industrial revolution. Some of the bourgeois home commoners are so powerful that they "buy" their titles of nobility, but nevertheless continue to be shunned by the hereditary aristocracy, which intends to enjoy the richness of what they perceive to be pushy but yield nothing their political power ... Money is the sinews of war, it was obvious that this situation could not continue and that because they can effectively penetrate the narrow circles of power of the monarchy, the pre-capitalist bourgeoisie of the era were inevitably led to an attempt to reverse this power ...

course all this accumulation of capital in the pre-industrial was done on the backs of slaves and Native Americans massacred, and never called to account, and c ' this is phenomenal mass of capital accumulated so quickly that laid the foundations of modern capitalism (especially the modern system of private banks challenging the authority and power of state banks, and even supplanting them).

This is a version of the story more realistic and you never hear in the school curriculum because it undermines all the myths about the sacrosanct Republican Revolution, and reveals that just since the beginning, the Republic is a plutocracy ...

Um, this is how to force diverge I come to write the blocks ... Poor Me!

Braces Colour Selector

How Societe Generale shareholders takes for pigeons! Dissent

I react to this excellent article A2N , I am a regular reader. I also want to bounce it, because he said a lot of things I thought and that many close observers believe the markets.

I would add to his point of view from my analysis on the likely real scenario behind these events and the enormous loss of 7 billion euros announced yesterday.

The biggest scam in banking history

First, we must understand that this loss is enormous: several times those of Credit Lyonnais in the 90 who had brought shame on this bank, and had even led to questions about the possibility of putting the bank into bankruptcy. Finally it is the French taxpayer who paid the bill (including hundreds of millions of euros in fines claimed by the authority of the U.S. market several years after the French part of the case was closed).

is also 5-7 times more losses than the losses Baring's Bank, supposedly sunk by Nick Leeson, the trader mad Singapore.

Note that since the case of Leeson, banks have strengthened their control over the activities of traders.

It is extremely difficult for a trader to take positions as risky without the system knowing it.

I would add about Baring's, that malpractice Leeson was in fact a pretext, as it appeared at the end of this case that is $ 2 billion were evaporated without having knowledge of how and where this mass of dollars have apparently escaped Leeson. When you know that Leeson deceived the top executives of the bank by using a pair of scissors, glue and a photocopier to falsify documents and signatures, we can not help but think that his positions were in fact known and that some senior members of his bank took the opportunity to fiddle into believing that everything was the fault of Leeson. Leeson as a trader in the case of the SG, Krievel, had not taken these hyper risky speculative positions to enrich themselves, but because they were caught in a kind of casino player: I lose, and I want I repeat, So I bet more.

One man against a bank?

There are many similarities in the case of SG with that of Baring's particular level of improbabilities!

Already, the system of control of the purse as SG in all banks is extremely rigorous: several teams of auditors and inspectors monitor the operations and monitor each other, in competition and meeting each a separate branch. What makes that even assuming a trader with the complicity of the controllers fails.

Furthermore, transactions which were accounted the most basic trader. The kind of simple operations, which leaves a trader beginner, medium, as it seems that is the case Krievel, according to the communication of the SG.

To explain one man overcame control systems, we are told that this guy was a computer genius.

Problem: how an employee who is transferred from the Operations Control to the front office can maintain its access to the computer system? Lack of IT management? Lack of procedure? Incredible when you think of all the means for checking and sealing between market transactions and control of these operations!

In addition, the banking systems are complex: there have been little more than a computer genius to tamper with, but have a real background in IT, which was not If this trader.

A type unstable and fragile shelled trader with a bank yet hyper-selective?

Other retail ladle: the profusion of details on this type, whereas usually the markets are extremely modest for such cases. It is true that this guy is not Polytechnique and seems to be a trader of base! Indeed one wonders how he managed to become a trader when you know how the environment is closed and is dedicated to all father's son "out of the best schools (if you come from the suburbs and you finished Polytechnic Staff, you can forget to send your application: not even in dreams!).

We are told that this type was a fragile person who knew of family problems and tortured personality ... In short, a guy who would have been reset from the first interview with the SG, especially the recruitment to SG is quasi fascist: the candidates are scanned almost every angle, psychological profiles are drawn tight, all those who have been interviewed in various banks will argue that the most dismal interviews are those of the SG. It almost seems sometimes to be a guinea pig dissected by men in white coats ... It is hard to believe they missed such a profile. Unless of course assuming that this type is most likely only a son to his father who had already entered the bank. This explains that he could have a place to trade, despite the bump at these places, including for the Pistons ...

This wealth of detail expected to give credibility to the theory of solitary trader and crazy to the general public, in fact, this argument undermines the eyes of those who know something about markets.

The subprime crisis, the probable cause of all this hoax

It is in the public domain since this summer that markets are traversed by one of the worst housing crisis in the U.S., which spread into the world of finance worldwide. This is the subprime crisis. In two words: banks have lent money at variable rates to poor Americans to buy their house in a housing market spiraling. These loans helped to accelerate the increase in solvency a request insolvent, but also precipitated the fall: with the inevitable increases in interest rates (such loans having been made to historically low levels), hundreds of thousands of homeowners poor could not pay their credit. Seizure of their property and put up for auction. The problem: when 1 million homes are suddenly seized and put together almost all auctions, real estate prices collapsed. The panic spread to financial markets, as credit companies who lent money to insolvent people, were quick to get rid of their debts by selling them as securities markets. With the complacency of the U.S. rating companies that evaluated these securities as extremely safe, as they were worthless, the banks of the world bought whole, because as long as real estate went up, took the titles of value, and it was a convenient way to quickly boost its results.

Lots of banks obsessed with short-term investing so heavily in these securities, exposing inconsidéremment to a risk that had not been assessed.

These securities continue to fall today and entail the banks in turmoil.

But everyone knows that in France the outstanding results generated by the SG in recent years were linked to these titles: the French bank SG was the most at risk ...

The trap

We will now consider the likely scenario explaining the huge losses of SG.

Friday night closure of U.S. markets, and bad news raining down on procurement, including the plan that Bush has disappointed financiers. New fall at an opportune time: the Monday after U.S. stock markets are closed ...

result, the panic will be mainly in Asian markets and European, especially on Monday morning for Europe.

The edges of any institutional massively liquidate positions which results in a crash.

Conveniently, and coincidentally, it was during the weekend that the SG had reported on the shenanigans of their trader. They decide to liquidate positions without waiting. Coincidentally this happens in a market where it was easy to predict the volatility seen the beginning of panic at the weekend on Asian bourses. The operations of the SG thus pass unnoticed in the flow of securities settlement early this week. What specifically avoids creating a wave of panic on the SG title. On the other hand, the crash pushed the ACC, so the trader's liquidation of positions resulting in a big loss.

This scenario is improbable!

Firstly, what a happy coincidence that the SG discovers the pot to the roses on the eve of a predictable crash, best time to place orders massive without being noticed.

Presumably, the SG was aware long before.

Then the decision was taken on Sunday saying by SG without waiting to liquidate the portfolio is pure madness! For if there had been no crash, movements of such magnitude as the SG have created a panic that would have completely destabilized the share price. Notwithstanding the crash Monday that helped hide the transactions, the logical reaction of SG have been liquidating their positions in a phased manner so as not to attract attention, and try to limit losses, see the clear advantage.

Either the chance is extremely good things, or the explanation lies elsewhere.

I think the explanation lies elsewhere. This trader would probably be a bit perilous positions. But I do not think he could jeopardize the bank or play beyond its means, especially in a market that was deemed simple. We could understand if it was a super market and hyper risky speculative, volatile and hyper! But in the event of a canard invented by SG, hide such large losses in super risky operations would have been less easy in the context of the crash, than to hide in thousands of more traditional operations. This requires better to smooth the losses of thousands of transactions that bullshit on a few large transactions risky especially in the context of a crash in which the securities traded heavily. It is more discreet. It melts in the bulk orders in a way.

In fact, the SG has certainly used this pretext, and especially foreseeable crash on Monday, to get rid of a bunch of crappy values.

Rather than go for incompetents who invested in securities inconsidéremment rotten, they preferred to invent this story and posing as victims.

What makes they herald as 2 billion euros for losses related to subprime, the remainder had to be priced at the most egregious bank fraud in history.

What about the trader in question? Or he is complicit and will accept a sentence of imprisonment in VIP area with private bedroom, TV, internet access and the whole shebang. With remission he was released after one year with a giant check that awaits him in a tax haven.

Either he is himself a victim of a plot: his incompetence was detected by management, it would be one who falsified the information systems and control systems for him to blame. This poor guy can not do that includes the case may very well believe he is guilty! Falsification of computer systems and control is more likely from those who have the burden from a former management control that we have not disabled the passwords.

In fact the risk if the trader is taking a lamplighter for others, it has already been liquidated itself: it would explain his disappearance at the time j am writing this text.

5 billion euros, it's enough gun down more than one man.

In this case we do ever find. I do not hope for him.

precedents in this kind of scheming to save face

SG invented the whole story to save face in the markets, and explain its enormous losses, especially on the eve of a capital increase. This is not to panic investors and that the title does not dive too. It has also not too morflé.

To clarify this matter, we will have the authority market analysis very carefully operations on the SG in recent weeks. I'm pretty convinced that there was insider trading and that just happened this bank leaders have played their stock options before all this broke.

Unfortunately, even if so I am under no illusions: I think at this level of scam, everyone is complicit and close your eyes. Including state and therefore even the chief of state: it is rumored that it has 2 million managed by the SG ...

Do not forget that Calyon had already fallen for the mad trader in August: another crazy trader shorting all control systems have scorched nearly one billion euros ...

This excuse right back!

All I can hope for is that at least this case precipitated the end of this trade reserved for son to dad, and all may be replaced by computer systems. 99% of traders are automated tasks by computer systems, traders themselves acknowledge elsewhere. Could be reduced by a factor 100 the number of son to father who gorge themselves on coke and whores trading floor. It would be of public health! Yet they could find to resettle elsewhere!

When you think there are lots of jobs that are replaced by minimum wage earners because of automation, especially in banks where all the little hands are making compulsory retirement (now Most documents are scanned using character recognition, so that nothing that the operation of endorsement of checks yesterday that employed thousands of workers, is almost completely automated now, and it is that a task among others) ... We can only find the unjust treatment meted out to kids, who barely out of school to take the kings of the world, earning 20 to 40 times the minimum wage, without being productive, and regularly fucking shit money the taxpayer that is used to offset their losses.

Also we must not forget that the SG and CEO Daniel Bouton, had originally sued in the case of the Trail. Billions of francs had been diverted to Israel via the operations of cavalry. Only part of the case had been tried, and the amounts were already enormous. But the French court in his clemency had decided to prosecute small traders of the trail hand, and the big banks on the other hand.

course after rogue traders have been condamnéss, the component of the banking business had been withdrawn to the investigating judge who had discovered the case, then the charges were buried. While all showed that the scam could not have happened without the involvement of French banks and Israeli ...

can therefore rightly be wary As this story abracabrantesque trader poor, unstable and fragile, which is still bright enough to outsmart all systems and all the checks and create the most gigantic loss in the history of the Exchange ...