I just have a look at the site of Claude Ribbe ... Especially on his blog.
I have always found Mr. Ribbe said on his blog and his books very interesting things ...
And I always regretted that Ribbe never take advantage to Dieudonné. Dieudonné is not because black, but because Dieudonne denounced his words to him, which denounces with Ribbe his prose Normale in his blog and his books.
See next issue which is fried Ribbe Gallo cons who monopolizes the issue to justify the horrors! We see that Ribbe is particularly pugnacious, and is a victim of the same opponents and the same methods as Dieudonné.
review the way the entire program, we see how the word Ribbe and Ramadan is respected by the little néosionistes involved in the issue, as Gallo burp like a Nazi, cutting the floor constantly spewing outright or Valls on Ramadan.
So obviously, unlike Confident Ribbe, never daring to cross the yellow line which is to address the unspeakable. He does not do it by focusing on individuals such as Finkielkraut for example, but losing sight of Fink is that the interchangeable cog in a system, and it is far more effective to attack the heart system.
But the truth is that when Dieudonné had the lobby on the coat, they all did in their pants!
Ribbe him, had treated Dieudo clown and participated in its way to discredit the message by attacking the messenger ... When asked about Dieudo he came out of this embarrassing issue that wants to television is required that blacks condemn the maroons, pretending not to be interested in what it said "clown" who, n has not referred Normal Sup ', could not have interesting opinions on the matter. Elitist way of thinking put on the shelf and the claims for billions of human beings on earth who will never have the chance to pursue higher education.
But I must concede that at least did not Ribbe responsible for timely Dieudo get a place in the media.
He could have done.
That would have been pointless, as the examples of opportunistic Beyala Kelman and demonstrate, but he could be tempted ...
If not defended Dieudonne, at least he has not been too bad against him! Because
Beyala and Kelman them in terms of careerism more or less awkward ...
Beyala were extenuating circumstances: at the time she went with Drucker and hoped to get married by Michel, who saw him in this story of a banal story buttocks.
Vexed since the Drucker has dampened hopes of an upstart, Beyala found a slightly more combative speech that I have seen betrayal by denouncing his romance in a book, which will benefit "strangely" not TV promo, and also through his statements against Zoe's Ark.
But it was completely discredited, and at least blow the whistle at the slightest promise of a folding seat in sight, it will start to spit on the Maroons as Dieudonné who dare to attack the system of thought unique double standard.
Kelman is to put this together that Beyala, he was offered access to TV and a promo for his unexpected books in exchange for his anti-Dieudonne charges.
Curiously he will return to his accusations anti-Dieudonne on RMC radio, and even adopt a tone of protest to defend some of his ideas ... Maybe he had seen on the Internet that the sites black community thought of him? No matter because after that he changed several more times to review the matter, without knowing the reason for his inconsistency. Anyway, Kelman has lost all credibility as Beyala. Now they have come to serve, I doubt if the system proves grateful saw the ingratitude that characterizes ... Kelman and Beyala will therefore betrays the anti-negrophobia for less than nothing, worse than Judas who had received his 30-denier ... Let's go to
Ribbe: well stronger than Dieudonne (which uses humor and provocative), it attacks the negrophobia through long demonstrations bookish and scholarly, but unlike Dieudonné who attacks all forms of racism (at negrophobia anti-African Anti-Caribbean, but also Arabophobia, Islamophobia, Zionism, etc..) Claude Ribbe confined to the anti-Caribbean negrophobia that it seems ...
I say that it seems to me because I think he adopts contradictory attitudes on the subject. He has long held alongside the Collective Dom, and Patrick Karam that hump now with Sarkozy. I do not know exactly what relationship he had with Karam (thank you for informing me in forum, I think they had clashed), but in any case Karam, the "black issue" does not arise: in the name of the citizenship that distinguishes blind no color among its citizens ...
is really nice, but in fact must be recognized that a black who is denied housing or a job because he is black, regardless of whether West Indian citizen so for centuries, or African freshly landed.
But in a lot of West Indians still prevails that vision that has been imposed by the settler, it is the rejected children of Africa, that Africans did not want them and that is why Africans would have "sold" to the French slavers. Method abject destruction of the identity of a victim by making it guilty of his own misfortunes. Method unfortunately as old as the world and we can see in action in Iraq, Palestine, Lebanon, Iran tomorrow, yesterday throughout Africa, Asia etc. colonial times. But if indeed
African tribes took part in the transatlantic slave trade, we must know that they had no choice. A bit like the neo-colonial Africa has not chosen to live in misery ...
You should know that before the emergence of African kings, the African coast Atlantic fought slavers. They were the first victims of trafficking.
And it is because their struggle became increasingly effective, and therefore capture slaves returning more and more expensive than the slave traders have decided to finance "black kings" in their pay, which are the ancestors current African dictators, responsible for selling the black slave traders in exchange for firearms, which gave them an advantage over neighboring tribes they were going to raid, but in exchange for worthless beads and rum imported from West Indies.
The system of negro kings was imposed across Africa as the system is imposed dictators today ...
The trial is being done to Africans is a mock trial in a largely ... That does not mean there is no responsibility on the African side: we need to separate things and distinguish active collaborators with the victims of this system. But do not confuse the collaborator with the payer. Just as it is a mock trial to say "the French" are slavers. Behind this "the" generalizing very convenient, lies a few families of the bourgeoisie and nobility who became the great capitalists of the modern era. Accumullé on capital the backs of slaves and colonized over the centuries, including metropolitan white slaves who worked in factories or mines, now finds himself converted in cases more or less "serious", but has not been squandered . As long as we continue to say "French", "Arabs", "blacks" or "Jews" were slaveholders, they will be accused of anti-French racism, anti-everything and prevent research on the real owners of the money accumulated at the expense of human misery.
Aparté passage: Dieudonné has been sentenced for allegedly said "Jews are slave "as he never said it, but he spoke of militia racists who were assaulting her audience in Lyon, saying" those who attack me are slave ...". But even if 'he had said "Jews are slave ...", I do not see how it's more racist than saying that it was blacks or Arab slave traders, as one hears all the time in the media . His conviction is therefore entirely political and not based on anything.
But back in to Ribbe: he dithers, he squirms, it's OK to tackle negrophobia but in his corner, and especially not on the side of infréquentables as Dieudonné, would not it party to be treated as anti-Semitic turn. Claude yet do not worry, now that the fate of Dieudonné is set, it will be your turn to go through it.
Because the tactic is simple slave, she walks and has also been applied successfully in the Arab or the Vietminh.
This is divide and conquer.
It was far easier to attack a lobby Dieudo isolated Beyala an insulated, isolated Kelman, an isolated Ribbe, a Confident insulated etc etc rather than a block that is sustained in anti-negrophobia despite the divisions and disputes that may occur internally.
Probably Claude Ribbe answer that does not recognize the Ogres, he was asked if the issue publicly, as the Ogres are victims of the campaign's false accusations have to suffer Dieudonné.
But just read what he thinks of Olivier Petre-Grenouilleau and Pap N'dyaye bail black, to know that he thinks the same thing as us. Ogres have also been the first to denounce OPG, when it was made public mention of its work in issuing Elkabbach on Public-Sénat.
All this is unfortunately policy: we have seen, Claude Ribbe has thought through he would have the blessing of Bayrou for legislative ...
Under these conditions, OK to terminate, but without going too hard and not appear too close to the "Semitic" imagined, especially as it appeared at Sarcelles where the Jewish vote is very powerful.
Claude, know that I saw the show where we saw you shake hands at the market and distributing leaflets, putting up posters ... Sorry to say, but I felt sorry for you ... Obviously you still hoping to have the imprimatur Bayrou's party, and without doubt it was the show to attract his attention ...
qu'Ogre As I knew already that it does be useless: OK, for free labor, distribution of leaflets etc.. By cons believe that you would be rewarded for your efforts Billposters it be naive in politics. All played in the background, and you had already accumulated a liability that you went beyond the pale.
Especially within the party that Bayrou you great enemies, as you Lozes love so much cutting.
The impression it gives me all this: Too much dithering, the Afro-Caribbean revolve around the bush too, instead of block Negrophobia cons.
In the fight against anti-Semitism, the Jewish community rallied each time, including when they are embedded in mock battles and handling. It is the opposite extreme of what can be seen in blacks.
Jews of all stripes and persuasions different can come together to march against anti-Semitism, be it fantasy or exaggeration.
blacks who have good reasons to march (how many dead burnt black in slums owned by slumlords or killed in police brutality?) do not because they are divided, or the so called \\ becaufe representative associations actually represent anything.
Representativeness blacks could possibly be done by the convergence of media and intellectual personalities, artists, sportsmen, writers, philosophers, historians, etc..
And that's where I was going with this article: Claude Ribbe think in the back lot of the things said Dieudonne in his sketches or her controversial statements. I'm sure the bottom Claude Ribbe fully agrees with this idea of "slave converted in the bank." Dieudonne said under the influence of emotion after the attack on his audience, and after being treated dirty negro, but his statements are not based on anything! Claude Ribbe who is an expert on Haitian history necessarily know the history of Gradis, these wealthy Jews who built their fortunes on the sugar industry and the slave trade in Santo Domingo, while the French crown jewels. Inevitably the return of Dieudonné would remind him of certain episodes in the history of Haiti. But it is clear that he preferred not to brave the media storm and stand back from this story. Without taking too openly sided with Dieudonne he could simply say that Dieudonne was right ... Only Rosa Amelia Plummelle-Uribe dare do so. Even if it was not publicized, it is to his credit for having done so.
There will be no representation of blacks, as blacks to the black profile will remain their separate ways.
Whether you like it or not, you artists, intellectuals, athletes who represent the black with the rest of the population ...
If you are unable to support each other when you negrophobia insidious campaign rages against one of you, so do not come crying to the fact that nothing changes.
Dieudonné had it fully understood the role that was his, not only as black but as a spokesperson for all the voiceless, the outcasts, the marginalized. That's why it was and continues to be (although now boycotting the media) on all fronts against racism. He did not spare him his solidarity with others, not hesitating to lend his theater to lecture or serve as a meeting.
This union is essential, and would be around the Dieudonné and cons his lynching, which announced simply sidelined blacks who have things to say.
But she has not made and will not happen and that's unfortunate. The case
Dieudonne has been the developer of it.
The media strategy is perfectly clear now that Dieudonné is sidelined and that Sarkozy won the elections: the claims of racist blacks do not interest anyone. Dieudo exit, exit Ribbe and the little black personalities that had something to say about racism (as Lilian Thuram, who had the opportunity to say things very fair but we no longer see either).
Today blacks are highlighted are those who read the teleprompter and an angel face but the farm (as Roselmack ...), or else are blacks who are politically correct jokes (Fabrice Eboue ...). The
Negrophobes can sleep.
0 comments:
Post a Comment